Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395062›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Effect of a mechanical grooming brush on the behavior and health of recently weaned heifer calves.

Ana Velasquez-Munoz, Diego Manriquez, Sushil Paudyal, Gilberto Solano, Hyungchul Han, Robert Callan, Juan Velez, Pablo Pinedo

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Welfare of Cattle in Different Housing Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Caring animals and the ways we wrong them.Biology & philosophy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Velasquez-MunozDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Diego ManriquezDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Sushil PaudyalDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Gilberto SolanoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Hyungchul HanDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, California Polytechnic University Pomona, Pomona, CA, 91768, USA.
Robert CallanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Juan VelezAurora Organic Farms, Boulder, CO, 80302, USA.
Pablo PinedoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. pinedop@colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-3377
Colorado State University · USCalifornia State Polytechnic University · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2016-51300-25734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalf stress at weaning and during transition to group pens represents a concern in dairy operations. Favoring natural behaviors, such as grooming, may help on reducing this challenge. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a mechanical grooming brush on behavior and health of recently weaned calves, after transferring from individual to group housing. Two treatment groups (control [CON, n = 81]; automated brush [AB, n = 81]) were compared enrolling Holstein heifers (94 ± 7 d old) that were monitored for 20 days. Four cohorts, considering one CON and one AB group (19-20 calves/pen/cohort) were enrolled sequentially. Each calf was weighed, clinically evaluated, and affixed with a 3-D accelerometer sensor attached to the ear at enrolment. Continuous measurements (min/h) were generated for the following behaviors: Not-active, active, highly active, eating, and ruminating. Cameras for continuous video recording were installed in each pen, and calves were weighted at the last day of the study (d 20). Behavioral data were summarized as daily averages (min/h). Data was examined using repeated measures analysis for nested factors, with day as the time unit.

resultsOverall, calves had their first interaction with the brush within 2.5 days with a mean (SE) of 7 (±9.6) h after being transferred to group pens. A significant effect was determined for the interaction day by treatment on the time spent not-active and eating. Average not-active time was greater in CON compared to AB (22.8 ± 0.82 min/h vs. 21.7 ± 0.82 min/h), while eating time was greater in AB compared with CON (7.01 ± 0.40 min/h vs. 6.43 ± 0.40 min/h). Treatment groups had a similar weight gain and time to the first disease.

conclusionsWe concluded that the use of a mechanical brush influenced behavior, reducing not-active time, while increasing eating time. The consequences of this change in activity require further investigation.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleFemaleGroomingHousing, AnimalSocial BehaviorBehaviorDairy heiferMechanical brushWelfare

Identifiers

PMID31395062
PMCPMC6686348
OpenAlexW2967688501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.