Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395047›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical ethics2019

Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Claire Blakeley, Debbie M Smith, Edward D Johnstone, Anja Wittkowski

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hope pluralism in antenatal palliative care.Journal of medical ethics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire BlakeleyThe University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, 2nd Floor, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Debbie M SmithThe University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, 2nd Floor, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Edward D JohnstoneThe University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, 2nd Floor, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Anja WittkowskiThe University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, 2nd Floor, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Anja.wittkowski@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-0183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation on the factors influencing parents' decision-making process following a lethal, life-limiting or severely debilitating prenatal diagnosis remains deficient. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to explore the influencing factors for parents considering termination or continuation of pregnancy following identification of lethal, life-limiting or severely debilitating fetal abnormalities.

methodsElectronic searches of 13 databases were conducted. These searches were supplemented by hand-searching Google Scholar and bibliographies and citation tracing. Thomas and Harden's (2008) thematic synthesis method was used to synthesise data from identified studies.

resultsTwenty-four papers were identified and reviewed, but two papers were removed following quality assessment. Three main themes were identified through systematic synthesis. Theme 1, entitled 'all life is precious', described parents' perception of the importance of the fetus' life, a fatalistic view of their situation alongside moral implications as well as the implications decisions would have on their own life, in consideration of previous life experiences. Theme 2 ('hope for a positive outcome') contained two sub-themes which considered the parent's own imagined future and the influence of other people's experiences. Finally, Theme 3 ('a life worth living') presented three sub-themes which may influence their parental decision-making: These described parental consideration of the quality of life for their unborn child, the possibility of waiting to try for another pregnancy, and their own responsibilities and commitments.

conclusionThe first review to fully explore parental decision-making process following lethal, life-limiting, or severely debilitating prenatal diagnosis provided novel findings and insight into which factors influenced parents' decision-making process. This comprehensive and systematic review provides greater understanding of the factors influential on decision-making, such as hope, morality and potential implications on their own and other's quality of life, will enable professionals to facilitate supported decision-making, including greater knowledge of the variables likely to influence parental choices.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedDecision MakingFamilyFemaleForecastingHumansParentsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisAbortionBirthContinuationDisorderLife-limitingPregnancyTermination

Identifiers

PMID31395047
PMCPMC6688313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.