Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395016›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network.

B Le Floch, H Bastiaens, J Y Le Reste, H Lingner, R Hoffman, S Czachowski, R Assenova, T H Koskela, Z Klemenc-Ketis, P Nabbe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners' choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study.Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

B Le FlochEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France. blefloch1@univ-brest.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2405-6634
H BastiaensDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Y Le ResteEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
H LingnerCentre for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
R HoffmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
S CzachowskiClinical Psychology Department, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
R AssenovaDepartment of Urology and General Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
T H KoskelaUniversity of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland.
Z Klemenc-KetisDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
P NabbeEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
A SowinskaFacultad de Humanidades, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile.
T MontierEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
L PeremansDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Université de Bretagne Occidentale · FRMedical University Plovdiv · BGMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENicolaus Copernicus University · PLTampere University · FITel Aviv University · ILUniversidad de Antofagasta · CLUniversité Européenne de Bretagne · FRUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Ljubljana · SIVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral Practice (GP) seems to be perceived as less attractive throughout Europe. Most of the policies on the subject focused on negative factors. An EGPRN research team from eight participating countries was created in order to clarify the positive factors involved in appeals and retention in GP throughout Europe. The objective was to explore the positive factors supporting the satisfaction of General Practitioners (GPs) in clinical practice throughout Europe.

methodQualitative study, employing face-to-face interviews and focus groups using a phenomenological approach. The setting was primary care in eight European countries: France, Belgium, Germany, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Finland, Poland and Israel. A thematic qualitative analysis was performed following the process described by Braun and Clarke. Codebooks were generated in each country. After translation and back translation of these codebooks, the team clarified and compared the codes and constructed one international codebook used for further coding.

resultsA purposive sample of 183 GPs, providing primary care to patients in their daily clinical practice, was interviewed across eight countries. The international codebook included 31 interpretative codes and six themes. Five positive themes were common among all the countries involved across Europe: the GP as a person, special skills needed in practice, doctor-patient relationship, freedom in the practice and supportive factors for work-life balance. One theme was not found in Poland or Slovenia: teaching and learning.

conclusionThis study identified positive factors which give GPs job satisfaction in their clinical practice. This description focused on the human needs of a GP. They need to have freedom to choose their working environment and to organize their practice to suit themselves. In addition, they need to have access to professional education so they can develop specific skills for General Practice, and also strengthen doctor-patient relationships. Stakeholders should consider these factors when seeking to increase the GP workforce.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceJob SatisfactionEuropeFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWork-Life BalanceAdultCareer choiceCareer mobilityFamily practiceGeneral practitionersHealth care systemHumansJob satisfactionPhysicianPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID31395016
PMCPMC6688263
OpenAlexW2967232016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.