ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2019
Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiac MRI.
Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06964672 (Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Advanced Imaging With Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Heart Failure Patients: a Prospective Study
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Revascularization in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardiac MRI-guided therapeutics in ischemic cardiomyopathy: impact on heart-team consensus and outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging survey on imaging for myocardial viability.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value and clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients after sudden cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.Open heart · 2025Article
- Article
- Myocardial Viability: Evolving Insights and Challenges in Revascularization and Functional Recovery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided recanalization for left anterior descending artery chronic total occlusion: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI assessment of myocardial viability in chronic myocardial infarction: how should we do it?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Potential utility of SPECT/CT with 99mTc-Tektrotyd for imaging of post-myocardial infarction inflammation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Left Ventricular Functional Remodeling after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
- Prediction of nonviable myocardium by ECG Q-Wave parameters: A 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction because of coronary artery disease is common, and ascertaining which patients will benefit from revascularization can be challenging. Viability testing is an accepted means by which to base this decision, with multiple noninvasive imaging modalities available for this purpose. This review aims to highlight the key role of cardiac magnetic resonance in myocardial viability assessment, with a focus on its unique strengths over other imaging modalities. RECENT
findingsTransmural extent of hyperenhancement with late gadolinium imaging has been shown to be greater acutely in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and regress at follow-up studies. An explanation for this reported phenomenon and an argument against redefining CMR viability criteria in the acute setting will be offered. SUMMARY: Although not universally available, cardiac magnetic resonance is an exceptionally powerful and well tolerated imaging modality that should be considered when viability testing will influence patient management. Although observational outcomes data suggest a promising prognostic role for viability, randomized studies in this area are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.