Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31394425›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

Considerable differences between auditory medulla, auditory midbrain, and hippocampal synapses during sustained high-frequency stimulation: Exceptional vesicle replenishment restricted to sound localization circuit.

Sina E Brill, Katrin Janz, Abhyudai Singh, Eckhard Friauf

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sina E BrillAnimal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, D-67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Katrin JanzAnimal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, D-67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Abhyudai SinghElectrical & Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Eckhard FriaufAnimal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, D-67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany. Electronic address: eckhard.friauf@bio.uni-kl.de.
University of Kaiserslautern · DEUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

CRCNS: Mechanistic Modeling and Inference of Neuronal Synaptic TransmissionR01DC019268 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SINGH, ABHYUDAI · 2020 to 2022
$333k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable synaptic transmission is essential for interneuronal communication. Synaptic inputs to auditory brainstem neurons, particularly those involved in sound localization, are characterized by resilience during sustained activity and temporal precision in the sub-millisecond range. Both features are obtained by synchronous release of a high number of synaptic vesicles following a single action potential. Here, we compare transmission behavior of three heterogeneous types of inputs in the auditory midbrain and medulla. The first terminate in the central inferior colliculus (ICc) and are glutamatergic (activated from the lateral lemniscus, LL). The medullary inputs terminate in the lateral superior olive (LSO) and are glutamatergic (from the cochlear nuclear complex, CN) or glycinergic (from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, MNTB). LSO neurons are the first to integrate binaural information and compute interaural level differences, whereas ICc neurons receive information from almost all auditory brainstem nuclei and construct an initial auditory image used for reflexive behavior. We hypothesized that CN-LSO and MNTB-LSO inputs are more resilient to synaptic fatigue during sustained stimulation than LL-ICc inputs. To test the hypothesis, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in acute brainstem slices of juvenile mice. We investigated the synaptic performance during prolonged periods of high-frequency stimulation (60 s, up to 200 Hz) and assessed several features, e.g. depression, recovery, latency, temporal precision, quantal size and content, readily releasable pool size, release probability, and replenishment rate. Overall, LL-ICc inputs performed less robustly and temporally precisely than CN-LSO and MNTB-LSO inputs. When stimulated at ≥50 Hz, the former depressed completely within a few seconds. In contrast, CN-LSO and MNTB-LSO inputs transmitted faithfully up to 200 Hz, indicative of very efficient replenishment mechanisms. LSO inputs also displayed considerably lower latency jitter than LL-ICc inputs. The latter behaved similarly to two types of input in the hippocampus for which we performed a meta-analysis. Mechanistically, the high-fidelity behavior of LSO inputs, particularly MNTB-LSO synapses, is based on exceptional release properties not present at auditory midbrain or hippocampal inputs. We conclude that robustness and temporal precision are hallmarks of auditory synapses in the medullary brainstem. These key features are less eminent at higher stations, such as the ICc, and they are also absent outside the central auditory system, namely the hippocampal formation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationSound LocalizationSynaptic TransmissionAnimalsAuditory PathwaysFemaleGlutamic AcidGlycineHippocampusMaleMedulla OblongataMesencephalonMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityReaction TimeGlutamic AcidGlycineAuditory brainstem neuronsNon-auditory synapsesProlonged short-term plasticityReliabilityResilienceSustained activity

Identifiers

PMID31394425
PMCPMC8171223
OpenAlexW2960312548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.