Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31394366›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2019

Dissociations in semantic cognition: Oscillatory evidence for opposing effects of semantic control and type of semantic relation in anterior and posterior temporal cortex.

Catarina Teige, Piers L Cornelissen, Giovanna Mollo, Tirso Rene Del Jesus Gonzalez Alam, Kristofor McCarty, Jonathan Smallwood, Elizabeth Jefferies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catarina TeigeDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK.
Piers L CornelissenDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.
Giovanna MolloDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK.
Tirso Rene Del Jesus Gonzalez AlamDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK.
Kristofor McCartyDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK. Electronic address: beth.jefferies@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GBNorthumbria University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J006963/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the brain represent and process different types of knowledge? The Dual Hub account postulates that anterior temporal lobes (ATL) support taxonomic relationships based on shared physical features (mole - cat), while temporoparietal regions, including posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), support thematic associations (mole - earth). Conversely, the Controlled Semantic Cognition account proposes that ATL supports both aspects of knowledge, while left pMTG contributes to controlled retrieval. This study used magnetoencephalography to test these contrasting predictions of functional dissociations within the temporal lobe. ATL and pMTG responded more strongly to taxonomic and thematic trials respectively, matched for behavioural performance, in line with predictions of the Dual Hub account. In addition, ATL showed a greater response to strong than weak thematic associations, while pMTG showed the opposite pattern, supporting a key prediction of the Controlled Semantic Cognition account. ATL showed a stronger response for word pairs that were more semantically coherent, either because they shared physical features (in taxonomic trials) or a strong thematic association. These effects largely coincided in time and frequency (although an early oscillatory response in ATL was specific to taxonomic trials). In contrast, pMTG showed non-overlapping effects of semantic control demands and thematic judgements: this site showed a larger oscillatory response to weak associations, when ongoing retrieval needed to be shaped to suit the task demands, and also a larger response to thematic judgements contrasted with taxonomic trials (which was reduced but not eliminated when the thematic trials were easier). Consequently, time-sensitive neuroimaging supports a complex pattern of functional dissociations within the left temporal lobe, which reflects both coherence versus control and distinctive oscillatory responses for taxonomic overlap (in ATL) and thematic relations (in pMTG).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetoencephalographyMaleNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeTemporal LobeYoung AdultAngular gyrusAnterior temporal lobeControlled retrievalMEGPosterior middle temporal gyrusSemantic

Identifiers

PMID31394366
PMCPMC6854548
OpenAlexW2957922576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.