Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393982›Full record

SynthesisSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019

A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on pain empathy: investigating the role of visual information and observers' perspective.

Josiane Jauniaux, Ali Khatibi, Pierre Rainville, Philip L Jackson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07432841 (Innovative Neuromodulation Treatments for Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07432841 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Neuromodulation Treatments for Chronic Pain: Assessing and Predicting the Effects of Personalized High-Definition Protocols for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2025 to 2027Enrolled144ConditionsChronic PainArmsAnodal High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Cathodal High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Sham (No Treatment)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Target Weight and Gender Moderate Anti-Black Bias in Pain Perception.Social psychological and personality science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Parietofrontal Networks Mediate Contextual Influences in the Appraisal of Pain and Disgust Facial Expressions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josiane JauniauxÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Ali KhatibiCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), 4545, Chemin Queen-Mary, Montréal, QC H3W 1W4, Canada.
Pierre RainvilleCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), 4545, Chemin Queen-Mary, Montréal, QC H3W 1W4, Canada.
Philip L JacksonÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathy relies on brain systems that support the interaction between an observer's mental state and cues about the others' experience. Beyond the core brain areas typically activated in pain empathy studies (insular and anterior cingulate cortices), the diversity of paradigms used may reveal secondary networks that subserve other more specific processes. A coordinate-based meta-analysis of fMRI experiments on pain empathy was conducted to obtain activation likelihood estimates along three factors and seven conditions: visual cues (body parts, facial expressions), visuospatial (first-person, thirdperson), and cognitive (self-, stimuli-, other-oriented tasks) perspectives. The core network was found across cues and perspectives, and common activation was observed in higher-order visual areas. Body-parts distinctly activated areas related with sensorimotor processing (superior and inferior parietal lobules, anterior insula) while facial expression distinctly involved the inferior frontal gyrus. Self- compared to other-perspective produced distinct activations in the left insula while stimulus- versus other-perspective produced distinctive responses in the inferior frontal and parietal lobules, precentral gyrus, and cerebellum. Pain empathy relies on a core network which is modulated by several secondary networks. The involvement of the latter seems to depend on the visual cues available and the observer's mental state that can be influenced by specific instructions.

Indexed as

EmpathyAdultBrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexCuesFacial ExpressionFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPainParietal LobePhotic StimulationActivation Likelihood EstimatefMRIMeta-analysisPain empathyPerspective-takingVisual information

Identifiers

PMID31393982
PMCPMC6847411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.