ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2020
Autoantibodies in lung transplantation.
Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Inhibition of De Novo Autoantibody Production Attenuates Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts Despite Maintenance of High Donor-Specific Antibody Titers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Triple role of exosomes in lung transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- The role of lung-restricted autoantibodies in the development of primary and chronic graft dysfunction.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
- Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Review
- Prognostic impact of preoperative respiratory colonization on early-onset pneumonia after lung transplantation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- An update on current treatment strategies for managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2021Review
- Set Up for Failure: Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Lung Transplant.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) comprises both bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome as subtypes. After lung transplantation, CLAD remains a major limitation for long-term survival, and lung transplant recipients therefore have poorer outcomes compared with recipients of other solid organ transplants. Although the number of lung transplants continues to increase globally, the field demands detailed understanding of immunoregulatory mechanisms and more effective individualized therapies to combat CLAD. Emerging evidence suggests that CLAD is multifactorial and involves a complex, delicate interplay of multiple factors, including perioperative donor characteristics, inflammation induced immediately following transplant, post-transplant infection and interplay between allo- and autoimmunity directed to donor antigens. Recently, identification of stress-induced exosome release from the transplanted organ has emerged as an underlying mechanism in the development of chronic rejection and promises to prompt novel strategies for future therapeutic interventions. In this review, we will discuss recent studies and ongoing research into the mechanisms for the development of CLAD, with emphasis on immune responses to lung-associated self-antigens-that is, autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.