Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393583›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

Different microbiomes are found in healthy breeder ducks and those with foot pad dermatitis.

S M Qin, W Q Bai, K Y Zhang, X M Ding, S P Bai, J P Wang, H W Peng, Y F Yang, C Chen, Q F Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbiota and meat quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S M QinInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
W Q BaiInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
K Y ZhangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
X M DingInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
S P BaiInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
J P WangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
H W PengInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.
Y F YangTieqilishi Group Breeding Duck Co. Ltd., Mianyang 610000, Sichuan Province, China.
C ChenTieqilishi Group Breeding Duck Co. Ltd., Mianyang 610000, Sichuan Province, China.
Q F ZengInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University; Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot pad dermatitis (FPD) is a serious problem of the modern poultry industry, negatively affecting birds' welfare and health status, walking and feeding activity, growth performance, carcass quality, and economic performance of meat production. The gut microbiome in poultry with FPD has not been previously investigated. Therefore, we compared the cecal microbiomes of 8 breeding ducks with FPD to 8 control ducks (breeders with apparently healthy feet) by pyrosequencing the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. The results showed a significant β-diversity (P < 0.05) of cecal microbiota presented between healthy and FPD-affected breeder ducks. The plasma endotoxins, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-17, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α concentration, and the abundance of class Clostridia in FPD-affected ducks was markedly higher (P < 0.05), however, the abundance of genus Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Lachnospiraceae UCG-008, and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in FPD-affected ducks was significantly lower (P < 0.05) when compared to healthy ducks. These findings suggest when duck breeders are affected with FPD, ducks show an increased inflammatory response and a difference of structure and composition of the cecal microbiome.

Indexed as

DucksGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCecumDermatitisFemaleFoot DiseasesMalePoultry DiseasesRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16SrRNAcecal microbiomeduck breedersfoot pad dermatitisinflammatory response

Identifiers

PMID31393583
PMCPMC8913756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.