Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393397›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Effectiveness and safety of polydioxanone thread embedding acupuncture compared to physical therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: Study protocol for an assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Jae Ik Kim, Young Il Kim, Eunseok Kim, Ju Hyun Jeon, Jin Youp Kim, Ojin Kwon, So-Young Jung, Chang-Hyun Han

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Ik KimDepartment of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Young Il KimDepartment of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Eunseok KimDepartment of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Ju Hyun JeonDepartment of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
Jin Youp KimDepartment of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
Ojin KwonClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
So-Young JungClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Chang-Hyun HanClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.
Daejeon University · KRKorea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the number of patients who suffer from non-specific chronic neck pain (CNP) is increasing in the Republic of Korea, conservative treatments for patients with CNP have been spotlighted. Although several studies on thread embedding acupuncture (TEA) treatment have been published for the treatment of such patients, no randomized controlled trial has been reported that investigates the effectiveness and safety of the TEA treatment compared with other conservative treatments for the treatment of patients with CNP. Therefore, the purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEA to those of physical therapy (PT) for the treatment of patients with CNP. METHODS/

designThis study is planned as a parallel design, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, clinical study. One hundred twenty-eight patients diagnosed with CNP will be randomly assigned to either the TEA group or the PT group in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the TEA group will receive 4 sessions of TEA treatment, while those in the PT group will receive 8 sessions of PT treatment over 4 weeks. An assessment of effectiveness based on the outcomes of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), cervical spinal angle, Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), EuroQol-Five Dimension 3 level version (EQ-5D-3L), and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) will be conducted at baseline, and at 5, 9, and 13 weeks. The primary outcome is the mean change in the NPDS at 9 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) will be recorded at every visit. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will be expected to provide useful information for the effectiveness and safety of TEA treatment compared to PT treatment for patients with CNP.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service of Republic of Korea (CRIS- KCT0003720), April 5, 2019.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesResearch DesignAcupuncture TherapyChronic PainDisability EvaluationHumansMental HealthNeck PainPolydioxanoneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodPolydioxanone

Identifiers

PMID31393397
PMCPMC6709075
OpenAlexW2968843679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.