ArticleMedicine2019
Application of peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill newborns experience from a neonatal intensive care unit.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06414174 (Comparison Between Split Septum and Mechanical Valve Needleless Connector in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Very Preterm Babies or Birth Weight <1500 Grams at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Neonatology Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Split Septum and Mechanical Valve Needleless Connector in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Very Preterm Babies or Birth Weight <1500 Grams at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Neonatology Unit
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Prevention of complications related to peripherally inserted central catheter insertion techniques in newborns: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Pooled it
- Observational
- An Equation to Estimate PICC Catheter Length in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The applications, complications, and management of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs): a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter malposition in preterm infants: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Central Lines and Their Complications in Neonates: A Case Report and Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- An Unusual Vascular Track for Neonatal Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Case Report.Oman medical journal · 2022Article
- Terms of specialized nursing language in the care of the newborn with central venous catheter.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2022Article
- A clinical study on the tip localization of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) guided by intracavitary electrocardiography in newborns: a randomised trial.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Effect of implementing an Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter team in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.The journal of vascular access · 2021Article
- Article
- Arterial embolism caused by a peripherally inserted central catheter in a very premature infant: A case report and literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can provide nutritional and medical support for very low birth weight or critically ill newborns. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the use of PICCs in our clinic for critically ill newborns to evaluate the relationship between catheter related factors and the occurrence of complications.Retrospective analysis was conducted for all newborns consecutively admitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, who underwent PICC insertion between May 2011 and March 2018. Data collected included total puncture success rate, one puncture success rate, infection rate, complication rate, unplanned catheter withdrawal rate, device days, and catheter indwelling time.Five-hundred eighty-eight infants (304 males and 284 females) aged 3.4 ± 3.9 days, mean gestational age of 30.9 ± 2.7 weeks and a mean body mass of 1.38 ± 0.47 kg at insertion were included. Total puncture success rate was 99.65%, one puncture success rate was 77.77%. The mean catheter retention was 13.6 ± 6.7 days: more than 30 days in 15 (2.61%) cases, 20 to 30 days in 60 (10.43%) cases, 10 to 19 days in 372 (64.70%) cases, and 62 days in 1 case. Complications occurred in 63 (10.71%) cases: with PICC insertion within 24 hours after birth in 29 (15.43%), within 48 hours in 13 (6.63%), and after 48 hours in 21 (10.99%) cases. Catheter tip culture was positive in 3 cases and there was 1 case of catheter-related bloodstream infection.Nursing measures of the maintenance of body temperature and the evaluation of blood vessels were important conditions for improving the success rate of one puncture in critically ill neonates. PICC catheterization as early as 48 hours will not increase the difficulty of PICC puncture. Nor did it increase the incidence of PICC complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.