Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393261›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech.

Patrick J Karas, John F Magnotti, Brian A Metzger, Lin L Zhu, Kristen B Smith, Daniel Yoshor, Michael S Beauchamp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick J KarasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-8820
John F MagnottiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2093-0603
Brian A MetzgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Lin L ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Kristen B SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Daniel YoshorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Michael S BeauchampDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-9934
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Michael Peter Milham · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Dynamic Neural Mechanisms of Audiovisual Speech PerceptionU01NS113339 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEAUCHAMP, MICHAEL S, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2019 to 2023
$5.5M
NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF OPTIMAL MULTISENSORY INTEGRATIONR01NS065395 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Michael S Beauchamp · 2010 to 2026
$5.5M
Dynamic Neural Mechanisms of Audiovisual Speech PerceptionU01NS098976 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2018
$3.0M
Baylor Research Education Program in NeurosurgeryR25NS070694 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2010 to 2023
$1.2M
RAVE: A New Open Software Tool for Analysis and Visualization of Electrocorticography DataR24MH117529 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2018 to 2020
$718k
Using fMRI to Understand Verbal and Nonverbal Human CommunicationF30DC014911 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZHU, LIN L · 2015 to 2017
$129k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC014911NIDCD NIH HHS F30DC014911NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH117529NIMH NIH HHS R24MH117529NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065395NINDS NIH HHS R01NS065395NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS070694NINDS NIH HHS R25NS070694NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098976NINDS NIH HHS U01NS098976NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS113339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual information about speech content from the talker's mouth is often available before auditory information from the talker's voice. Here we examined perceptual and neural responses to words with and without this visual head start. For both types of words, perception was enhanced by viewing the talker's face, but the enhancement was significantly greater for words with a head start. Neural responses were measured from electrodes implanted over auditory association cortex in the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) of epileptic patients. The presence of visual speech suppressed responses to auditory speech, more so for words with a visual head start. We suggest that the head start inhibits representations of incompatible auditory phonemes, increasing perceptual accuracy and decreasing total neural responses. Together with previous work showing visual cortex modulation (Ozker et al., 2018b) these results from pSTG demonstrate that multisensory interactions are a powerful modulator of activity throughout the speech perception network.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMouthMovementSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionHumansTemporal Lobeaudiovisual integrationcross-modal suppressionECoG iEEGhumanhuman biologymedicinemultisensory integrationneuroscienceposterior superior temporal gyrus pSTGspeech

Identifiers

PMID31393261
PMCPMC6687434
OpenAlexW2968828818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.