Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393028›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2019

DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Michael Charles Lanz, Diego Dibitetto, Marcus Bustamante Smolka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular mechanisms attributed to colistin renal proximal tubular epithelial cytotoxicity.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael Charles LanzDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Diego DibitettoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Marcus Bustamante SmolkaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9952-2885

Funding

Coordination of ATR Signaling for Genetic Quality Control, Silencing, and DNA Repair During MeiosisR01HD095296 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Paula Elaine Cohen, Marcus Smolka · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
Cellular Responses to DNA Replication StressR01GM097272 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SMOLKA, MARCUS · 2011 to 2020
$2.7M
HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) R01HD095296HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM097272NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095296NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From bacteria to mammalian cells, damaged DNA is sensed and targeted by DNA repair pathways. In eukaryotes, kinases play a central role in coordinating the DNA damage response. DNA damage signaling kinases were identified over two decades ago and linked to the cell cycle checkpoint concept proposed by Weinert and Hartwell in 1988. Connections between the DNA damage signaling kinases and DNA repair were scant at first, and the initial perception was that the importance of these kinases for genome integrity was largely an indirect effect of their roles in checkpoints, DNA replication, and transcription. As more substrates of DNA damage signaling kinases were identified, it became clear that they directly regulate a wide range of DNA repair factors. Here, we review our current understanding of DNA damage signaling kinases, delineating the key substrates in budding yeast and humans. We trace the progress of the field in the last 30 years and discuss our current understanding of the major substrate regulatory mechanisms involved in checkpoint responses and DNA repair.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsDNA DamageHumansProtein KinasesSaccharomycetalesSignal TransductionProtein KinasescheckpointDNA damage responseDNA repairkinasemass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID31393028
PMCPMC6745504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.