Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31393003›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2020

Bayesian data integration and variable selection for pan-cancer survival prediction using protein expression data.

Arnab Kumar Maity, Anirban Bhattacharya, Bani K Mallick, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bayesian Transfer Learning.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Circadian Gene Selection for Time-to-event Phenotype by Integrating CNV and RNAseq Data.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arnab Kumar MaityEarly Clinical Development Oncology Statistics, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-0155
Anirban BhattacharyaDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Bani K MallickDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Veerabhadran BaladandayuthapaniDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Graph-based Bayesian analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01CA194391 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MALLICK, BANI K · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Proteomic-based integrated subject-specific networks in cancerR21CA220299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, HA, MIN JIN · 2018 to 2019
$378k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194391NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prognostic prediction using molecular information is a challenging area of research, which is essential to develop precision medicine. In this paper, we develop translational models to identify major actionable proteins that are associated with clinical outcomes, like the survival time of patients. There are considerable statistical and computational challenges due to the large dimension of the problems. Furthermore, data are available for different tumor types; hence data integration for various tumors is desirable. Having censored survival outcomes escalates one more level of complexity in the inferential procedure. We develop Bayesian hierarchical survival models, which accommodate all the challenges mentioned here. We use the hierarchical Bayesian accelerated failure time model for survival regression. Furthermore, we assume sparse horseshoe prior distribution for the regression coefficients to identify the major proteomic drivers. We borrow strength across tumor groups by introducing a correlation structure among the prior distributions. The proposed methods have been used to analyze data from the recently curated "The Cancer Proteome Atlas" (TCPA), which contains reverse-phase protein arrays-based high-quality protein expression data as well as detailed clinical annotation, including survival times. Our simulation and the TCPA data analysis illustrate the efficacy of the proposed integrative model, which links different tumors with the correlated prior structures.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBiometryComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansKidney NeoplasmsMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasmsPrognosisProtein Array AnalysisProteomeProteomicsSurvival AnalysisProteomeAFT regressionborrowing strengthhorseshoepan-cancer modelTCPA

Identifiers

PMID31393003
PMCPMC7007312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.