Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392698›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019

Mechanistic Studies on Cationization in MALDI-MS Employing a Split Sample Plate Set-up.

Jonas B Metternich, Martin F Czar, Mario F Mirabelli, Giovanni L Bartolomeo, Konstantin C M Zouboulis, Renato Zenobi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas B MetternichDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin F CzarDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mario F MirabelliDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Giovanni L BartolomeoDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Konstantin C M ZouboulisDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Renato ZenobiDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland. zenobi@org.chem.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-4358

Funding

Verband der Chemischen Industrie n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the analysis of polymers by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS), a commonly observed ionization pathway is cation-adduct formation, as polymers often lack easily ionizable (basic/acidic) functional groups. The mechanism of this process has been hypothesized to involve gas-phase cation attachment. In previous experiments, a split sample plate set-up has been introduced, enabling separate deposition of the components on individual MALDI plates. The plates are divided by a small gap of a few micrometers, allowing simultaneous laser irradiation from both plates, while precluding the possibility of any other interactions prior to ablation. Here, we extend on these studies by using different polymer-salt combinations to test the generalizability of a gas-phase ionization process. Clear evidence for in-plume ionization is presented for the model polymers poly (methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene. Furthermore, the contribution of in-plume processes to the overall ion formation by cationization is gauged, providing a first estimate for the importance of this pathway.

Indexed as

MALDI mechanismPolymer cationization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.