Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392645›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Osimertinib beyond disease progression in T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients: a multicenter study of clinicians' attitudes.

A Cortellini, A Leonetti, A Catino, P Pizzutillo, B Ricciuti, A De Giglio, R Chiari, P Bordi, D Santini, R Giusti and 27 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

A CortelliniMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy. alessiocortellini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1209-5735
A LeonettiMedical Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
A CatinoThoracic Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
P PizzutilloThoracic Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
B RicciutiDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
A De GiglioDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
R ChiariMedical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud "Madre Teresa Di Calcutta", Monselice, Italy.
P BordiMedical Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
D SantiniMedical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
R GiustiMedical Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
M De TursiDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
D BroccoClinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
F ZorattoMedical Oncology, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy.
F RastelliMedical Oncology, Fermo Area Vasta 4, Fermo, Italy.
F CitarellaMedical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
M RussanoMedical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
M FilettiMedical Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
P MarchettiMedical Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
R BerardiOncology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
M TorniaiOncology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
D CortinovisMedical Oncology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
E SalaMedical Oncology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
C MaggioniMedical Oncology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
A FolladorDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
M MacerelliDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
O NigroMedical Oncology, ASST-Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
A TuziMedical Oncology, ASST-Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
D IaconoPulmonary Oncology Unit, St. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
M R MigliorinoPulmonary Oncology Unit, St. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
G BannaMedical Oncology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
G PorzioMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
K CannitaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
M G FerraraComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
E BriaComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
D GalettaThoracic Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
C FicorellaMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
M TiseoMedical Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most cases, T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib developed "non-drugable" progression, as the patients with common EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with first-line osimertinib. In both settings, chemotherapy represents the standard treatment and local ablative treatments (LATs) are potential useful options in the case of oligo-progression.

methodsWe conducted a study on "post-progression" (pp) outcomes of T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib, according to the therapeutic strategy applied: osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs), "switched therapies" or best supportive care only (BSC).

results144 consecutive patients were evaluated: 53 (36.8%) did not received post-progression treatments (BSC), while 91 (63.2%) patients received at least 1 subsequent treatment; 50 patients (54.9%) received osimertinib beyond disease progression [19 (20.9%) of them with adjunctive LATs] and 41 (45.1%) a switched therapy. Median ppPFS (progression-free survival) and median ppOS (overall survival) of patients who received osimertinib beyond progression vs. switched therapies were 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.92), p = 0.0239] and 11.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.98), p = 0.0446]. Among patients who received osimertinib beyond progression with and without LATs median ppPFS was 6.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively [HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.18), p = 0.4560], while median ppOS was 20.2 months and 9.9 months, respectively [HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.03), p = 0.0748]. At the univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to the ppPFS was the therapeutic strategy in favor of osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). Moreover, the only variable which was significantly related to ppOS at the multivariate analysis was osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs).

conclusionOur study confirmed that in clinical practice, in case of "non-druggable" disease progression, maintaining osimertinib beyond progression (with adjunctive LATs) is an effective option.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionErbB ReceptorsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndolesItalyLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibPyrimidinesBeyond progressionEGFRNSCLCOsimertinibProgression of diseaseT790M

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.