Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392563›Full record

SynthesisCerebellum (London, England)2019

The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome-a Meta-analysis.

Narjes Ahmadian, Kirsten van Baarsen, Martine van Zandvoort, Pierre A Robe

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. From early psychiatric symptoms to an adolescent diagnosis: Clues from childhood in spinocerebellar ataxia Type-42.Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Narjes AhmadianUtrecht University Medical Centre, 100 Heidelberglaan, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.ahmadian@students.uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6447-9781
Kirsten van BaarsenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Utrecht University Medical Centre, 100 Heidelberglaan, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martine van ZandvoortPsychological Laboratory, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Medical Centre, 100 Heidelberglaan, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pierre A RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Rudolf Magnus Brain Institute, Utrecht University Medical Centre, 100 Heidelberglaan, G03.126, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) was first described by Schmahmann and Sherman in 1998. Despite their clear depiction of the syndrome, it is our experience that the CCAS has not yet found solid ground as a disease entity in routine clinical practice. This made us question the dimension of the CCAS in cerebellar patients. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines, in order to answer the question whether patients with acquired isolated cerebellar lesions perform significantly worse on neuropsychological testing compared to healthy controls. Studies were selected based on the predefined eligibility criteria and quality assessment. The systematic search resulted in ten studies, mainly observational cohorts consecutively including adult patients with isolated cerebellar lesions. Patients were compared to healthy controls, and neuropsychological investigation was done within one year of diagnosis. Meta-analysis of the twelve tests that were done in two or more studies showed that cerebellar patients perform significantly worse on Phonemic Fluency, Semantic Fluency, Stroop Test (naming, reading and interference), Block Design test and WMS-R visual memory. Cerebellar patients have significant and relevant deficits in the visuospatial, language and executive function domain. This meta-analysis therefore emphasizes the importance of the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome as described by Schmahmann and Sherman.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsCerebellar DiseasesCognition DisordersExecutive FunctionHumansMood DisordersAffectionCCASCerebellar cognitive affective syndromeCerebellumExecutive functionLanguageNeuropsychological testsVisuospatial

Identifiers

PMID31392563
PMCPMC6761084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.