Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392494›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Megaprosthesis in distal femur nonunions in elderly patients-experience from twenty four cases.

Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran, Dhanasekara Raja Palanisami, Rajkumar Natesan, Dheenadhayalan Jayaramaraju, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Modified use of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for distal femoral nonunions.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Indian orthopaedics: the past, present, and future.International orthopaedics · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raja Bhaskara RajasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India. rajalibra299@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-7411
Dhanasekara Raja PalanisamiDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Rajkumar NatesanDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Dheenadhayalan JayaramarajuDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Shanmuganathan RajasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Ganga Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyTo evaluate the outcomes and complications using cemented megaprosthesis in elderly patients with distal femur nonunions (DFN). MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2012 and 2016, 24 patients of DFN with an average age of 71.8 years (66-83) and an average 1.9(1-3) prior surgery was managed with distal femur replacement using cemented modular endoprosthesis. Outcomes were analysed on the following criteria: implant status, complications, knee range of motion, Knee Society Score (KSS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

resultsAll patients were extremely satisfied with their outcomes. At an average 22.1 months (10-43) follow-up, patients had an average 69.5° (40°-110°) knee flexion, an average KSS of 75.7 (63-88) and an average MSTS score of 19.3 (17-25). Four patients died at an average 21.3 months after surgery due to causes unrelated to the fracture. One patient (4.1%) had implant-related complication; deep infection which required debridement and intravenous antibiotics. There were no late amputations or peri-operative deaths and no patient had aseptic loosening of components.

conclusionBy permitting immediate full weight-bearing ambulation and with most patients returning to an acceptable functional status, cemented megaprosthesis is a viable and useful single-stage management option in elderly patients with DFN.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsFemaleFemoral FracturesFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, UnunitedHumansKnee JointMalePatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsRange of Motion, ArticularBone CementsArthroplastyDistal femur nonunionsElderlyKnee Society ScoreMegaprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID31392494
PMCPMC7224092
OpenAlexW2966232343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.