Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2019
Positive effects of the inclusion of open-mouth pressure for elimination of blood in microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy.
Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesPrimary varicocele (PVC) may cause testicular hypofunction and scrotal pain. We believe that the currently used procedure microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) can be further improved to provide more benefits to the patients.
methodsIn total, 100 patients who were diagnosed as having PVC grade II or III with venous reflux based on ultrasound results, along with scrotal pain and visible scrotal varicose veins, were enrolled; they were randomly divided into two groups. When the experimental group underwent MSV, stagnant venous blood in the internal spermatic vein close to the testis was drained using manual pressure, whereas the control group was treated with routine MSV procedure. The patients' psychological condition, symptoms, prognoses, scrotal appearances, and other related indexes were evaluated before and after the surgeries, and the results were compared.
resultsScores on days 1-3 after the surgeries were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05) for the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) after viewing the scrotum immediately after the surgeries, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) after viewing the scrotum immediately after the surgeries, and the average visual analog scale (VAS). No significant differences were found between the groups for other evaluation indexes (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe use of open-mouth pressure for elimination of blood reduces postoperative filling of dilated scrotal veins, reduces the visual stimuli to patients immediately after surgery, significantly improves the anxiety and depression of patients, helps to maintain positive mental condition in patients after the surgeries, and increases their confidence in recovery from the disease. It also leads to better pain relief within a short period after the surgery and maximizes surgical benefits for the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.