Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392469›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2019

Genomic and physiological analyses reveal that extremely thermophilic Caldicellulosiruptor changbaiensis deploys uncommon cellulose attachment mechanisms.

Asma M A M Khan, Carl Mendoza, Valerie J Hauk, Sara E Blumer-Schuette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asma M A M KhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, 118 Library Drive, 374 Dodge Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Carl MendozaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, 118 Library Drive, 374 Dodge Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Valerie J HaukDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, 118 Library Drive, 374 Dodge Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.
Sara E Blumer-SchuetteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, 118 Library Drive, 374 Dodge Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA. blumerschuette@oakland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9522-4266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Caldicellulosiruptor is comprised of extremely thermophilic, heterotrophic anaerobes that degrade plant biomass using modular, multifunctional enzymes. Prior pangenome analyses determined that this genus is genetically diverse, with the current pangenome remaining open, meaning that new genes are expected with each additional genome sequence added. Given the high biodiversity observed among the genus Caldicellulosiruptor, we have sequenced and added a 14th species, Caldicellulosiruptor changbaiensis, to the pangenome. The pangenome now includes 3791 ortholog clusters, 120 of which are unique to C. changbaiensis and may be involved in plant biomass degradation. Comparisons between C. changbaiensis and Caldicellulosiruptor bescii on the basis of growth kinetics, cellulose solubilization and cell attachment to polysaccharides highlighted physiological differences between the two species which are supported by their respective gene inventories. Most significantly, these comparisons indicated that C. changbaiensis possesses uncommon cellulose attachment mechanisms not observed among the other strongly cellulolytic members of the genus Caldicellulosiruptor.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiomassCelluloseEubacterialesGenome, BacterialGenomicsCelluloseCaldicellulosiruptorCellulaseExtreme thermophileTāpirin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.