ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020
Comparison of PD-L1 expression between paired cytologic and histologic specimens from non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2022Pooled it
- InterobServer AgreeMent in Pd-l1 evaLuatIoN on cytoloGical samples-SAMPLING project: A multi-institutional, international study.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Checkpoint Inhibitor Expression Directly on Exfoliated Cells from Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparative evaluation of PD-L1 expression in cytology imprints, circulating tumour cells and tumour tissue in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- PD-L1 and beyond: Immuno-oncology in cytopathology.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2021Review
- PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: heterogeneity by pathologic types, tissue sampling and metastasis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- PD-L1 Testing in Cytological Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: A Comparison with Biopsies and Review of the Literature.Acta cytologica · 2021Review
- PD-L1 in Cytological Samples: A Review and a Practical Approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- [Chinese Expert Consensus on Standards of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Testing for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020Article
- Reliability of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) on cytological smears in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective validation study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression of programmed death ligand 1 assessed on histologic samples is a confirmed predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, but its evaluation is not approved for immunocytochemistry. We investigated if PD-L1 expression shows comparable results on paired cytologic and histologic tumor specimens and interobserver variability. Percentage of PD-L1-positive tumor cells of 247 paired samples of non-small cell lung cancer was evaluated by three independent investigators. Samples were compared on the basis of the continuous values and also categorized with the tumor proportion score (TPS). Concordance was defined if continuous values were both within a deviation of 10% and if categorized values were identically grouped. Interobserver variability was assessed by the standard deviation of the mean. Based on continuous values between paired samples, perfect concordance rate was approximately 53%. With categorization of PD-L1 expression based on TPS, category was identical in 74.1%. However, defining the continuous values of PD-L1 expression between paired samples within a deviation of 10% as concordant, concordance rate was 82%. Interobserver variability was significantly higher in evaluation of cytologic specimens. Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in paired histologic and cytologic tumor specimens shows comparable results if a deviation of 10% between the values is tolerated. Interobserver variability demonstrates a much more challenging interpretation of PD-L1 expression for cytologic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31392467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.