Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392388›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2019

[The importance of radiology in bone sarcoma diagnostics : Initial and advanced diagnostics].

Volker Vieth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volker ViethKlinik für Radiologie, Klinikum Ibbenbüren, Große Straße 41, 49477, Ibbenbüren, Deutschland. v.vieth@klinikum-ibbenbueren.de.
Stadtarchiv Ibbenbüren · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable diagnostic assessment of malignant bone lesions remains a challenge in all the medical disciplines involved. The high incidence of benign (mainly pediatric) bone lesions needs to be distinguished from the rare malignant counterparts. If clinical presentation and patient history are unable to exclude a malignant tumour, adequate imaging of the affected region is necessary.

objectivesThis article focuses on giving implementable advice in dealing with problems and questions arising in the diagnostic process of treating patients with suspected or confirmed bone sarcoma. Also, follow-up recommendations from a radiological point of view are presented.

methodsReview and discussion of relevant literature against personal experiences in the medical imaging of patients with bone sarcomas.

resultsInterpretation of projection radiographic images usually succeeds in assessing a bone tumour's dignity by evaluating periosteal reaction, the formation of a tumour matrix and consideration of the Lodwick classification. A current adaptation of the classic Lodwick classification incorporates diagnostic possibilities of more recent imaging techniques (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)) and is presented in this article. Plain radiographs are superseded by MRI as the primary imaging performed when depicting bone lesions with increasing frequency. The role of MRI in terms of primary diagnostics, staging, planning of biopsy tracts and tumour resections, evaluation of treatment response and follow-up are discussed. All diagnostic imaging techniques, including whole-body imaging methods, relevant in the diagnosis and therapy of bone sarcomas are presented in the sequence in which they appear during treatment.

conclusionsRadiological imaging and expertise are important pillars in diagnosis and treatment of bone sarcomas. A variety of complementing imaging techniques provide a treatment-relevant basis significant for all medical disciplines involved.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographySarcomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone cancerBone diseasesBone tumorFollow-up careMedical imagingTumor staging

Identifiers

PMID31392388
OpenAlexW2965639233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.