Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392358›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Pharmacological studies of effort-related decision making using mouse touchscreen procedures: effects of dopamine antagonism do not resemble reinforcer devaluation by removal of food restriction.

Jen-Hau Yang, Rose E Presby, Adam A Jarvie, Renee A Rotolo, R Holly Fitch, Mercè Correa, John D Salamone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effort, timing and choice: a refined rodent effort choice task with excellent sensitivity to dopamine modulators.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vigor, Effort-Related Aspects of Motivation and Anhedonia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reduced Motivation in Perinatal Fluoxetine-Treated Mice: A Hypodopaminergic Phenotype.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jen-Hau YangBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Rose E PresbyBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Adam A JarvieBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Renee A RotoloBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
R Holly FitchBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Mercè CorreaBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
John D SalamoneBehavioral Neuroscience Division, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. john.salamone@uconn.edu.
University of Connecticut · USUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

University of Connecticut Research Foundation Tier II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEffort-based decision-making tasks offer animals choices between preferred reinforcers that require high effort to obtain vs. low effort/low reward options. The neural mechanisms of effort-based choice are widely studied in rats, and evidence indicates that mesolimbic dopamine (DA) and related neural systems play a key role. Fewer studies of effort-based choice have been performed in mice.

objectivesThe present studies used touchscreen operant procedures (Bussey-Saksida boxes) to assess effort-based choice in mice.

methodsCD1 mice were assessed on a concurrent fixed ratio 1 panel pressing/choice procedure. Mice were allowed to choose between rearing to press an elevated panel on the touchscreen for a preferred food (strawberry milkshake) vs. consuming a concurrently available less preferred alternative (high carbohydrate pellets).

resultsThe DA D

conclusionHaloperidol reduced the tendency to work for food, but this reduction was not due to decreases in primary food motivation or preference. Mouse touchscreen procedures demonstrate effects of haloperidol that are similar but not identical to those shown in rats. These rodent studies may be relevant for understanding motivational dysfunctions in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingDopamineDopamine AntagonistsFeeding BehaviorHaloperidolMaleMiceDopamineDopamine AntagonistsHaloperidolBussey-Saksida chambersDopamineMotivationPanel pressingPreference testSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31392358
OpenAlexW2966395333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.