Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392262›Full record

ArticleScience advances2019

Efficient apoptosis requires feedback amplification of upstream apoptotic signals by effector caspase-3 or -7.

Scott McComb, Pik Ki Chan, Anna Guinot, Holmfridur Hartmannsdottir, Silvia Jenni, Maria Pamela Dobay, Jean-Pierre Bourquin, Beat C Bornhauser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 264 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott McCombDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-7864
Pik Ki ChanDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5290-7825
Anna GuinotDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9933-8356
Holmfridur HartmannsdottirDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-0714
Silvia JenniDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Maria Pamela DobayDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Jean-Pierre BourquinDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Beat C BornhauserDepartment of Oncology and Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-3191
University Children's Hospital Zurich · CHIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apoptosis is a complex multi-step process driven by caspase-dependent proteolytic cleavage cascades. Dysregulation of apoptosis promotes tumorigenesis and limits the efficacy of chemotherapy. To assess the complex interactions among caspases during apoptosis, we disrupted caspase-8, -9, -3, -7, or -6 and combinations thereof, using CRISPR-based genome editing in living human leukemia cells. While loss of apical initiator caspase-8 or -9 partially blocked extrinsic or intrinsic apoptosis, respectively, only combined loss of caspase-3 and -7 fully inhibited both apoptotic pathways, with no discernible effect of caspase-6 deficiency alone or in combination. Caspase-3/7 double knockout cells exhibited almost complete inhibition of caspase-8 or -9 activation. Furthermore, deletion of caspase-3 and -7 decreased mitochondrial depolarization and cytochrome c release upon apoptosis activation. Thus, activation of effector caspase-3 or -7 sets off explosive feedback amplification of upstream apoptotic events, which is a key feature of apoptotic signaling essential for efficient apoptotic cell death.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalApoptosisCaspase 3Caspase 7Caspase 8Caspase 9Cell PolarityCytochromes cGene Knockout TechniquesHumansMitochondriaSignal TransductionCASP3 protein, humanCaspase 3Caspase 7Caspase 8Caspase 9Cytochromes c

Identifiers

PMID31392262
PMCPMC6669006
OpenAlexW2964569023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.