ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2019
Survival benefits and predictors of use of chemoradiation compared with radiation alone for early stage (T1-T2N0) anal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Outcome following local excision of T1 anal cancers-a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Thirty-Two Years of Radiotherapy for T1 Anal Cancer: Patterns, Outcomes, and Side-effects at a Single Institution.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review Defining Early Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Identifying Treatment.Cancers · 2025Review
- Perineal body squamous cell carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy - a case report.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of a prognostic nomogram for anal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2019.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- De-Escalation of Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus.Cancers · 2021Review
- A population-based analysis of chemoradiation versus radiation alone in the definitive treatment of patients with stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Is Radiation Therapy Alone Sufficient Treatment?Cancers · 2020Article
- Racial Disparities in Time to Treatment Initiation and Outcomes for Early Stage Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.American journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard of care treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). However, the necessity of CRT over radiation alone for T1-2N0 disease is less certain.
methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients who received CRT, defined as initiation of chemo and RT within 14 days of each other, or RT alone (without any chemo during initial treatment phase) for cT1-2N0M0 SCC of the anus. The cohort was limited to patients less than 70 years old with Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index of 0, receiving a radiation dose range of 4,500-5,940 cGy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess for predictors of CRT usage. Five-year overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test both for the full cohort and then on the subsets of T1 and T2 patients.
resultsWe identified 4,564 patients, of whom 4,371 (95.8%) received CRT and 193 (4.2%) received RT alone. Median follow up was 49.8 months. About 33.5% of patients had cT1N0 disease, while 66.5% of patients had cT2N0 disease. On multivariable logistic regression, patients were more likely to receive CRT if they had T2 disease [OR 2.318 (1.732-3.102), P<0.0001]. Five-year OS was 86.6% for CRT and 79.1% for RT (P=0.001). For T1 patients, 5-year OS was 90.3% with CRT and 84.7% with RT (P=0.114). For T2 patients, 5-year OS was 84.7% with CRT and 72.8% with RT (P<0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed association between OS and CRT use [HR 0.588 (95% CI: 0.430-0.804), P=0.001].
conclusionsThe vast majority of patients under age 70 without significant comorbidities are treated with CRT over radiation alone for early stage anal SCC, with better survival associated with CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.