Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31392031›Full record

ArticleVirus evolution2019

Contrasting selective patterns across the segmented genome of bluetongue virus in a global reassortment hotspot.

Maude Jacquot, Pavuluri P Rao, Sarita Yadav, Kyriaki Nomikou, Sushila Maan, Y Krishna Jyothi, Narasimha Reddy, Kalyani Putty, Divakar Hemadri, Karam P Singh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Prospects of Next-Generation Vaccines for Bluetongue.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maude JacquotInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5945-4689
Pavuluri P RaoElla Foundation, Genome Valley Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sarita YadavThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, UK.
Kyriaki NomikouMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-1853
Sushila MaanCollege of Veterinary Sciences, LLR University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Y Krishna JyothiVeterinary Biological and Research Institute, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Narasimha ReddyPVNR Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Kalyani PuttyPVNR Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Divakar HemadriICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Karam P SinghCentre for Animal Disease Research and Diagnosis, Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Narender Singh MaanCollege of Veterinary Sciences, LLR University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Nagendra R HegdeElla Foundation, Genome Valley Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Peter MertensThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, UK.
Roman BiekInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3471-5357

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H531478/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001446Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For segmented viruses, rapid genomic and phenotypic changes can occur through the process of reassortment, whereby co-infecting strains exchange entire segments creating novel progeny virus genotypes. However, for many viruses with segmented genomes, this process and its effect on transmission dynamics remain poorly understood. Here, we assessed the consequences of reassortment for selection on viral diversity through time using bluetongue virus (BTV), a segmented arbovirus that is the causative agent of a major disease of ruminants. We analysed ninety-two BTV genomes isolated across four decades from India, where BTV diversity, and thus opportunities for reassortment, are among the highest in the world. Our results point to frequent reassortment and segment turnover, some of which appear to be driven by selective sweeps and serial hitchhiking. Particularly, we found evidence for a recent selective sweep affecting segment 5 and its encoded NS1 protein that has allowed a single variant to essentially invade the full range of BTV genomic backgrounds and serotypes currently circulating in India. In contrast, diversifying selection was found to play an important role in maintaining genetic diversity in genes encoding outer surface proteins involved in virus interactions (VP2 and VP5, encoded by segments 2 and 6, respectively). Our results support the role of reassortment in driving rapid phenotypic change in segmented viruses and generate testable hypotheses for

Indexed as

bluetongue virusevolutionIndiareassortmentselection

Identifiers

PMID31392031
PMCPMC6680063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.