Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391944›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2019

Content and Quality of Websites for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Environmental Scan.

Michelle Smekal, Sarah Gil, Maoliosa Donald, Heather Beanlands, Sharon Straus, Gwen Herrington, Dwight Sparkes, Lori Harwood, Allison Tong, Allan Grill and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality assessment of consumer-facing websites on sodium reduction.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle SmekalDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-3628
Sarah GilDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maoliosa DonaldDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Heather BeanlandsDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sharon StrausDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gwen HerringtonCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dwight SparkesCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lori HarwoodLondon Health Sciences Centre, ON, Canada.
Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Allan GrillDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen TuDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Blair WaldvogelCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chantel LargeCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Claire LargeCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marta NovakDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matthew JamesDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meghan ElliottDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-2917
Maria DelgadoCan-SOLVE CKD Network Patient Partners, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Scott BrimbleDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Susan SamuelDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAMcMaster University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAThe University of Sydney · AUToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough numerous websites for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are available, little is known about their content and quality.

objectiveTo evaluate the quality of CKD websites, and the degree to which they align with information needs identified by patients with CKD.

methodsWe identified websites by entering "chronic kidney disease" in 3 search engines: Google.com (with regional variants for Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States), Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. We included the first 50 unique English-language sites from each search. We evaluated website content using a 30-point scale comprising 8 priority content domains identified by patients with CKD (

resultsOf the 2093 websites identified, 115 were included. Overall, sites covered a mean (SD) of 29% (17.8) of the CKD content areas. The proportion of sites covering content related to

conclusionsAlthough many CKD web sites were of reasonable quality, their readability was poor. Furthermore, most sites covered less than 30% of the content patients identified as important for CKD self-management. These results will inform content gaps in internet-accessible information on CKD self-management that should be addressed by future eHealth web-based tools.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseinternetonlineself-managementwebsites

Identifiers

PMID31391944
PMCPMC6668187
OpenAlexW2965071307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.