Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391775›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Comparison of the use of wireless capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance enterography in children with inflammatory bowel disease.

Nadia Mazen Hijaz, Thomas Mario Attard, Jennifer Marie Colombo, Neil Joseph Mardis, Craig Alan Friesen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Capsule Endoscopy in Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia Mazen HijazDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Missouri Kansas City, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Thomas Mario AttardDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Missouri Kansas City, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Jennifer Marie ColomboDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Missouri Kansas City, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Neil Joseph MardisDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Missouri Kansas City, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States. nmhijaz@cmh.edu.
Craig Alan FriesenDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Missouri Kansas City, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) are equally accepted modalities for noninvasive screening of small bowel involvement (SBI) in children with Crohn's disease (CD) and indeterminate colitis (IC) albeit there is a paucity of data comparing the two and thereby guiding the clinician in selecting the ideal diagnostic approach. Therefore, the goal of this study is to provide additional evidence for capsule endoscopy role in the evaluation of established Crohn's disease exacerbation compared to MRE in relation to Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI), and histological indices.

aimTo prospectively compare the findings of MRE and WCE and their agreement with PCDAI or histology in children with CD or IC.

methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with CD and IC were screened for inclusion. After informed consent, patient's demographic and clinical data was abstracted. The current pediatric disease activity index (PCDAI) and endoscopic findings were included. Patients underwent MRE and WCE including preprocedural patency capsule within a maximum of 7 d of each other. Pathological presence of active small bowel disease in ileal and duodenal biopsies were collected if the endoscopy was performed within 2 mo of the WCE study. Patients who failed to pass the PC were excluded from the study. WCE was read by two different experienced gastroenterologists (Attard TM and Colombo JM) blinded to each other's findings and to the findings on MRE (Mardis NJ). Agreement between WCE reviewers, WCE and MRE findings and concordance between positive PCDAI and SBI based on MRE compared with WCE was computed.

resultsForty-five patients were included in the study, 18 withdrew and 27 (20 males and 20 CD), mean age (standard deviation) 13.46 (2.4) years, completed the study protocol. There were no instances of capsule retention. Concordance between gastroenterologist reviewers was excellent for the diagnosis of small intestinal CD with good correlation between the two Lewis scores (

conclusionWe suggest that MRE and WCE have a complementary role in the assessment of SBI in CD. WCE detected SBI with a much higher specificity while MRE had a higher sensitivity.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentChildDuodenumFemaleHumansIleumInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexUnited StatesChildrenCrohn’s diseaseIndeterminate colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseMagnetic resonance enterographyPediatricSmall bowel diseaseSmall bowel involvementWireless capsule endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31391775
PMCPMC6676548
OpenAlexW2966001049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.