ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019
Safety and Efficacy of Intra-caesarean IUCD: A Prospective Study at a Tertiary Care Centre.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilisation, effectiveness, and safety of immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a systematic literature review.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2023Pooled it
- Integration of contraception provision in emergency obstetric and neonatal care: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Experience on Safety, Expulsion, and Complication of Intracesarean Post-Partum Intrauterine Copper Device.Cureus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of postpartum IUCD in caesarean section patients.
methodsThis prospective observational study included 200 women, who gave informed consent for postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion during caesarean section from January 2013 to May 2014. These patients were followed up at 6 weeks and 6 months.
resultsThere were no major complaints in either group in post-operative period. At 6-month follow-up in PPIUCD users, 89.5% of patients continued to use this method. 5.5% were lost to follow-up, 2.5% had spontaneous expulsion, and 2.5% removed the IUCD due to various reasons. Eight per cent of patients who wanted removal of IUCD in the second follow-up were counselled to continue, and they did so.
conclusionThe results of our study suggest that immediate intra-caesarean IUCD insertion appears to be a safe and effective method of contraception. The acceptability of intra-caesarean IUCD was high, and its continuation rate has demonstrated its safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.