Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391720›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2019

Measured Versus Calculated Small Dense LDL-Cholesterol and Cardiometabolic Traits in a South African Population.

M Masoud, A P Kengne, R T Erasmus, G M Hon, M Macharia, T E Matsha

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein (sdLDL) and Its Correlates among Pregnant Women in Juth.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M Masoud1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Science, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, PO Box 1906, Bellville, Cape Town, 7530 South Africa.
A P Kengne3Non-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
R T Erasmus2Division of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
G M Hon1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Science, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, PO Box 1906, Bellville, Cape Town, 7530 South Africa.
M Macharia2Division of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
T E Matsha1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Science, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, PO Box 1906, Bellville, Cape Town, 7530 South Africa.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-dense low density lipoprotein (sdLDL) is increasingly viewed as a marker for evaluating atherogenic risk, however its clinical uptake is hampered by the cumbersomeness of available methods. Consequently, a number of alternative methods for the estimation of sdLDL have been developed and none have been tested in a population from Africa. We evaluated an equation to estimate sdLDL-C from classic lipid parameters in South Africans. This is a cross-sectional study involving 1550 participants in which direct measurement of sdLDL in 237 participants was performed using a homogeneous enzymatic assay. Their mean age (standard deviation, SD) was 54.2 (14.7) years. 156 (65.8%) were normotolerant, 29 (12.2%) prediabetes, 17 (7.2%) screen detected diabetes and 35 (14.8%) known diabetes. Measured sdLDL values ranged from 0.17 to 3.39 versus-1.85 to 2.52 mmol/L calculated sdLDL. There was a significant positive correlation between the two measurements with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.659 (95%CI: 0.581-0.726). In a regression model, the adjusted R

Indexed as

AfricaDiabetesLipidsMetabolic syndromeSmall-dense low density lipoprotein

Identifiers

PMID31391720
PMCPMC6660522
OpenAlexW2793646656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.