ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2019
Investigating novel anatomical predictors for endotracheal tube selection in dogs.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting dog tracheal diameter and length: A tool for improved intubation.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Pre-hospital emergency cricothyrotomy in dogs part 2: Airway sealing and ventilation using cricothyrotomy tubes.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of an appropriate endotracheal tube (ET) for orotracheal intubation in dogs is based largely on experience, with no well-established guidelines available. This study examined relationships between several novel and published methods for selecting endotracheal tubes in a heterogenous population of 79 adult dogs. The following measurements were included: left and right nare width, nasal septum width, sum of left and right nares width plus the nasal septum width, total nose width and height, tracheal width, metacarpal and digital footpad width and height, and body mass. Using the Bland and Altman ratio method, the calculation of Cube Root Mass provided the greatest accuracy and precision, predicting actual ET size use within 3 to 4 tube sizes. A simpler to calculate, but less precise method was Width of Nose/3. The majority of published methods for estimating ET size performed poorly, including nasal septum and tracheal width.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31391601PMC6625165W3012136132What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.