ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2019
Use of a confirmed mathematical method for back-analysis of IELT distributions: ejaculation time differences between two continents and between continents and men with lifelong premature ejaculation (Part 1).
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and emerging treatment options for premature ejaculation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- Men with subjective premature ejaculation have a similar lognormal IELT distribution as men in the general male population and differ mathematically from males with lifelong premature ejaculation after an IELT of 1.5 minutes (Part 2).International journal of impotence research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently it was shown that a stopwatch-measured IELT distribution can be transformed to a mathematical formula of a specific mathematical type distribution. The IELT distribution of men in the general population is a Lognormal distribution whereas that of Caucasian men with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) is a Gumbel Max distribution. In this article, we developed the mathematical formula of the IELT distribution of two other previously published stopwatch-mediated IELT studies in the general male population of the USA and Europe, respectively, by investigating the fitness of various well-known mathematical probability density distributions into the IELT distribution of the two studies. The better the fitness the lower is the goodnes of fit (GOF). We found that the lognormal distribution most accurately fitted the IELT distribution of 1405 men in the general population of the USA, and 1026 men in the general population of Europe, with a GOF of 0.056 and 0.061, respectively. The current study also shows that the Lognormal IELT distribution of two European studies in Caucasian males are quite similar but that the Lognormal IELT distribution of men in the USA deviates compared to the two European IELT distributions. As the USA study also included 25% of non-Caucasian males it may be speculated that ethnical factors play a role in this deviation of the IELT curve. In conclusion, the Lognormal distribution of the IELT distribution in USA and European general male populations reconfirms our previous finding of a Lognormal IELT distribution in two random samples of the general male population in four European countries and USA. The Lognormal IELT distributions of the general male population highly contrasts to the Gumbel Max IELT distribution in Caucasian males with lifelong PE, as has previously been found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31391576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.