Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391573›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Beta-blocker choice and exchangeability in patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an Italian register-based cohort study.

Maurizio Sessa, Annamaria Mascolo, Daniel Bech Rasmussen, Kristian Kragholm, Magnus Thorsten Jensen, Liberata Sportiello, Concetta Rafaniello, Giuseppe Michele Tari, Claudia Pagliaro, Morten Andersen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta-Blockers for the Treatment of Arrhythmias: Which Drug for Which Arrhythmia? A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Appraisal of β-Blocker Use in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maurizio SessaDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, København Ø, Denmark. maurizio.sessa@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-4744
Annamaria MascoloCampania Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Regional Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Daniel Bech RasmussenRespiratory Research Unit Zealand, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital, Ringstedgade 61, 4700, Næstved, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmUnit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Magnus Thorsten JensenHeart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, København, Denmark.
Liberata SportielloCampania Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Regional Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Concetta RafanielloCampania Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Regional Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe Michele TariCaserta Local Health Unit, Via Unità Italiana 28, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Claudia PagliaroCaserta Local Health Unit, Via Unità Italiana 28, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Morten AndersenDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-2860
Francesco RossiCampania Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Regional Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoCampania Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Regional Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical guidelines suggest that for patients with heart failure and concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol should be preferred over carvedilol. However, studies suggest a high proportion of carvedilol usage that remains unexplained. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the predictors of carvedilol choice in patients with heart failure and COPD that were naïve to carvedilol or metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol. Caserta Local Health Unit databases (Italy) were used as data sources. Age, sex, chronic/acute comorbidities, and co-medications were included in a logistic regression model to assess predictors of carvedilol choice. Chronic comorbidities include those defined in the Elixhauser comorbidity index and all hospitalizations within two years prior to the first beta-blocker prescription. Comedications include all redeemed prescriptions within one year prior to the beta-blocker prescription. Kernel density estimations were used to assess the overlap in propensity and preference scores distributions for receiving carvedilol and thereby potential beta-blocker exchangeability. Totally, 10091 patients composed the study population; 2011 were exposed to carvedilol. The overlapping of propensity scores distributions was 57%. Accordingly, the exchangeability was not reached. Atrioventricular block (Odds Ratio, OR 8.20; 95% Confidence Interval, 95% CI 1.30-51.80), cerebrovascular thrombosis (OR 7.06; 95% CI 1.14-43.68), chronic kidney disease (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.16-16.02), and acute heart failure (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.28-3.03) hospitalizations were statistically significantly associated with carvedilol choice. Analogously, human insulin (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.24-7.24), fondaparinux (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.17-5.21) or strontium ranelate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.06-3.90) redeemed prescriptions. In conclusion, this study suggests the absence of beta-blockers exchangeability and a preferential choice of carvedilol in patients with heart failure, COPD and concurrent chronic kidney disease, atrioventricular block, cerebrovascular thrombosis, acute heart failure or redeeming human insulin, fondaparinux or strontium ranelate prescriptions. Therefore, it suggests that choice of prescribing carvedilol over metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol is driven by differences in comorbidities and co-treatments.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAtrioventricular BlockBisoprololCarvedilolCerebrovascular DisordersCohort StudiesComorbidityDrug PrescriptionsDrug SubstitutionDrug UtilizationFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBisoprololCarvedilolMetoprololNebivolol

Identifiers

PMID31391573
PMCPMC6685956
OpenAlexW2966632531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.