Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391554›Full record

ArticleOncogene2019

Disulfiram's anti-cancer activity reflects targeting NPL4, not inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase.

Zdenek Skrott, Dusana Majera, Jan Gursky, Tereza Buchtova, Marian Hajduch, Martin Mistrik, Jiri Bartek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Zdenek SkrottInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Dusana MajeraInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan GurskyInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-7066
Tereza BuchtovaInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Marian HajduchInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-908X
Martin MistrikInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. martin.mistrik@upol.cz.
Jiri BartekInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. jb@cancer.dk.
Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine · CZScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) is a proposed biomarker and possible target to eradicate cancer stem cells. ALDH inhibition as a treatment approach is supported by anti-cancer effects of the alcohol-abuse drug disulfiram (DSF, Antabuse). Given that metabolic products of DSF, rather than DSF itself inhibit ALDH in vivo, and that DSF's anti-cancer activity is potentiated by copper led us to investigate the relevance of ALDH as the suggested molecular cancer-relevant target of DSF. Here we show that DSF does not directly inhibit ALDH activity in diverse human cell types, while DSF's in vivo metabolite, S-methyl-N,N-diethylthiocarbamate-sulfoxide inhibits ALDH activity yet does not impair cancer cell viability. Our data indicate that the anti-cancer activity of DSF does not involve ALDH inhibition, and rather reflects the impact of DSF's copper-containing metabolite (CuET), that forms spontaneously in vivo and in cell culture media, and kills cells through aggregation of NPL4, a subunit of the p97/VCP segregase. We also show that the CuET-mediated, rather than any ALDH-inhibitory activity of DSF underlies the preferential cytotoxicity of DSF towards BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells. These findings provide evidence clarifying the confusing literature about the anti-cancer mechanism of DSF, a drug currently tested in clinical trials for repositioning in oncology.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAcetaldehyde Dehydrogenase InhibitorsAldehyde DehydrogenaseAntineoplastic AgentsCulture MediaDisulfiramHumansK562 CellsNuclear ProteinsAcetaldehyde Dehydrogenase InhibitorsAldehyde DehydrogenaseAntineoplastic AgentsCulture MediaDisulfiramNPLOC4 protein, humanNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31391554
OpenAlexW2965238366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.