Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391266›Full record

ArticleGenetics2019

Invasion and Extinction Dynamics of Mating Types Under Facultative Sexual Reproduction.

Peter Czuppon, George W A Constable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter CzupponCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS, Collège de France, PSL Research University, 75231 Paris, France peter.czuppon@college-de-france.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-7237
George W A ConstableDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom peter.czuppon@college-de-france.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9791-9571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sexually reproducing isogamous species, syngamy between gametes is generally not indiscriminate, but rather restricted to occurring between complementary self-incompatible mating types. A longstanding question regards the evolutionary pressures that control the number of mating types observed in natural populations, which ranges from two to many thousands. Here, we describe a population genetic null model of this reproductive system, and derive expressions for the stationary probability distribution of the number of mating types, the establishment probability of a newly arising mating type, and the mean time to extinction of a resident type. Our results yield that the average rate of sexual reproduction in a population correlates positively with the expected number of mating types observed. We further show that the low number of mating types predicted in the rare-sex regime is primarily driven by low invasion probabilities of new mating type alleles, with established resident alleles being very stable over long evolutionary periods. Moreover, our model naturally exhibits varying selection strength dependent on the number of resident mating types. This results in higher extinction and lower invasion rates for an increasing number of residents.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationAnimalsCell CommunicationGerm CellsModels, BiologicalReproductionSexual Behavior, Animalbalancing selectionfacultative sexfinite populationsfrequency-dependent selectionisogamymating typesself-incompatibility

Identifiers

PMID31391266
PMCPMC6781889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.