Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391190›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

What were the impacts of the Committee on Safety of Medicines warning and publication of the NICE guidelines on trends in child and adolescent antidepressant prescribing in primary care? A population based study.

Paul A Tiffin, Jose L Mediavilla, Helen Close, Adetayo S Kasim, Patrick Welsh, Lewis W Paton, James M Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul A TiffinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1770-5034
Jose L MediavillaDarlington Community Team for Children and Young People, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Helen CloseThe Research Design Service North East and Cumbria, Institute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
Adetayo S KasimWolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Patrick WelshThe Research Design Service North East and Cumbria, Institute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
Lewis W PatonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-5634
James M MasonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of both the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) warning (December 2003) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance (September 2005) on antidepressant prescription rates in children and adolescents within the UK primary care service.

settingPopulation based study of primary care antidepressant prescribing using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

participantsUnder-18s presenting to primary care with a depressive disorder or related diagnostic code recorded in the CPRD. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Antidepressant prescription rates per month per 100 000 depressed 4-17 year olds.

resultsFollowing the CSM warning, the prior trend towards increased prescribing rates for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in children was significantly reversed (β for change in trend -12.34 (95% CI -18.67 to -6.00, p<0.001)). However, after the publication of the NICE guidelines the prior trend towards increased prescribing resumed for those SSRIs mentioned as potential treatments in the guidance (fluoxetine, citalopram and sertraline) (β for change in trend 11.52 (95% CI 5.32 to 17.73, p<0.001)). Prescribing of other SSRIs and tricyclics remained low.

conclusionsDespite a strong emphasis on psychosocial interventions for child and adolescent depression, it may be that the NICE guidelines inadvertently encouraged further antidepressant prescribing, at least for those SSRIs cited. Although the guidelines gave cautions and caveats for the use of antidepressants, practitioners may have interpreted these recommendations as endorsing their use in young people with depression and related conditions. However, more accurate prevalence trend estimates for depression in this age group, and information on the use of psychosocial interventions would be needed to rule out other reasons underlying this increase in prescribing.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesAdolescentAntidepressive AgentsChildDepressive DisorderDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareUnited KingdomAntidepressive Agentsepidemiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31391190
PMCPMC6686994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.