Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391116›Full record

ReviewRetrovirology2019

Comparative virology of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.

Michael P Martinez, Jacob Al-Saleem, Patrick L Green

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Retrovirology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael P MartinezCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jacob Al-SaleemCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Patrick L GreenCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. green.466@osu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-562X
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Role of Inflammation in Tax-mediated TumorigenesisP01CA100730 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Lee Ratner · 2003 to 2026
$44.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA100730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) was the first discovered human retrovirus and the etiologic agent of adult T-cell leukemia and HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis. Shortly after the discovery of HTLV-1, human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 (HTLV-2) was isolated from a patient with hairy cell leukemia. Despite possession of similar structural features to HTLV-1, HTLV-2 has not been definitively associated with lymphoproliferative disease. Since their discovery, studies have been performed with the goal of highlighting the differences between HTLV-1 and HTLV-2. A better understanding of these differences will shed light on the specific pathogenic mechanisms of HTLV-1 and lead to novel therapeutic targets. This review will compare and contrast the two oldest human retroviruses with regards to epidemiology, genomic structure, gene products, and pathobiology.

Indexed as

HTLV-II InfectionsHTLV-I InfectionsHumansHuman T-lymphotropic virus 1Human T-lymphotropic virus 2Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-CellLeukocytes, MononuclearParaparesis, Tropical SpasticAdult T-cell leukemiaAPH-2ATLHAM/TSPHBZHTLV-1HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesisHTLV-2Tax

Identifiers

PMID31391116
PMCPMC6686503
OpenAlexW2965857106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.