Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391067›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Cancer-immune interactions in ER-positive breast cancers: PI3K pathway alterations and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

Marcelo Sobral-Leite, Izhar Salomon, Mark Opdam, Dinja T Kruger, Karin J Beelen, Vincent van der Noort, Ronald L P van Vlierberghe, Erik J Blok, Daniele Giardiello, Joyce Sanders and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hormone Receptor Positive/HER2 Negative Breast Carcinoma: Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcelo Sobral-LeiteDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Izhar SalomonDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark OpdamDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dinja T KrugerDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin J BeelenDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent van der NoortDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald L P van VlierbergheDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erik J BlokDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daniele GiardielloDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce SandersDivision of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen Van de VijverDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hugo M HorlingsDivision of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J K KuppenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marleen KokDivision of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.kok@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLOncode Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

MRI OF THE HEART/ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF GALLSTONESF06TW001321 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BOGREN, HUGO G · 1987 to 1987
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is correlated with good prognosis and outcome after (immuno)therapy in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the role of TILs in luminal breast cancer is less clear. Emerging evidence has now demonstrated that genetic aberrations in malignant cells influence the immune landscape of tumors. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is the most common altered pathway in ER-positive breast cancer. It is unknown whether changes in the PI3K pathway result in a different composition of the breast tumor microenvironment. Here we present the retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized trial in ER-positive breast cancer on the prognostic and predictive value of specific tumor-associated lymphocytes in the context of PI3K alterations.

methodsWe included 563 ER-positive tumors from a multicenter trial for stage I to III postmenopausal breast cancer patients, who were randomized to tamoxifen or no adjuvant therapy. The amount of CD8-, CD4-, and FOXP3-positive cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantified by imaging-analysis software. We analyzed the associations between PIK3CA hotspot mutations, PTEN expression, phosphorylated proteins of the PI3K and MAPK pathway (p-AKT, p-ERK1/2, p-4EBP1, p-p70S6K), and recurrence-free interval after adjuvant tamoxifen or no adjuvant treatment.

resultsCD8-positive lymphocytes were significantly more abundant in PIK3CA-mutated tumors (OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.03-2.68). While CD4 and FOXP3 were not significantly associated with prognosis, patients with tumors classified as CD8-high had increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.14-3.41; multivariable model including PIK3CA status, treatment arm, and other standard clinicopathological variables). Lymphocytes were more often present in tumors with increased PI3K downstream phosphorylation. This was most pronounced for FOXP3-positive cells.

conclusionThese exploratory analyses of a prospective trial in luminal breast cancer suggest high CD8 infiltration is associated with unfavorable outcome and that PI3K pathway alterations might be associated with the composition of the tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDisease SusceptibilityForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMutationNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseReceptors, EstrogenT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseReceptors, EstrogenLuminal breast cancerPI3K pathwayPIK3CA mutationsTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID31391067
PMCPMC6686400
OpenAlexW2965988302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.