Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31391053›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2019

Evaluation of exacerbations and blood eosinophils in UK and US COPD populations.

Claus F Vogelmeier, Konstantinos Kostikas, Juanzhi Fang, Hengfeng Tian, Bethan Jones, Christopher Ll Morgan, Robert Fogel, Florian S Gutzwiller, Hui Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Rational use of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 35043, Marburg, Germany. vogelmei@med.uni-marburg.de.
Konstantinos KostikasRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.
Juanzhi FangNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Hengfeng TianKMK Consulting Inc, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Bethan JonesPharmatelligence, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher Ll MorganPharmatelligence, Cardiff, UK.
Robert FogelNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Florian S GutzwillerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Hui CaoNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Funding

Novartis Pharma AG N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood eosinophil counts and history of exacerbations have been proposed as predictors of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who may benefit from triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting β

methodsIn a retrospective cohort analysis we examined the profiles of COPD patients from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and US Optum Clinformatics™ Data Mart (Optum) databases with reference to exacerbation frequency and blood eosinophil distribution.

resultsOf the 31,437 (CPRD) and 383,825 (Optum) patients with COPD, 15,364 (CPRD) and 139,465 (Optum) met the eligibility criteria and were included. Among patients with ≥2 exacerbations and available eosinophil counts in the baseline period (CPRD, n = 3089 and Optum, n = 13414), 17.0 and 13.3% respectively had eosinophil counts ≥400 cells/μL. Patients with ≥2 exacerbations or eosinophil count ≥400 cells/μL during first year, exacerbated at least once (CPRD, 82.8% vs Optum, 80.6%) or continued to have eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL (76.8% vs 76.5%), respectively in the follow-up year. In both years, a higher variability in the number of exacerbations and eosinophil count was observed in patients with one exacerbation and eosinophil counts between 300 and 400 cells/μL; patients with eosinophil count < 150 cells/μL had the lowest variability. Approximately 10% patients had both ≥2 exacerbations and eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL across the databases.

conclusionA high variability in blood eosinophil counts over two consecutive years was observed in UK and US patients with COPD and should be considered while making treatment decisions. A small proportion of COPD patients had frequent exacerbations and eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceSymptom Flare UpAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEosinophilsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomUnited StatesCOPDEosinophilExacerbationTriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID31391053
PMCPMC6686508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.