ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Discovery of stroke-related blood biomarkers from gene expression network models.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging-related gene signatures as potential biomarkers in ischemic stroke: an integrated bioinformatics and machine learning study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Differential Expression of Circular RNAs in Rat Brain Regions with Various Degrees of Damage After Ischemia-Reperfusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Identification of Mitochondrial and Succinylation Modification-Related Gene Signature in Ischemic Stroke.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Urban and rural disparities in stroke prediction using machine learning among Chinese older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MiRNAs as potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Article
- Rapid triage for ischemic stroke: a machine learning-driven approach in the context of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.The EPMA journal · 2022Article
- Molecular basis of the association between transcription regulators nuclear respiratory factor 1 and inhibitor of DNA binding protein 3 and the development of microvascular lesions.Microvascular research · 2022Review
- Revisiting miRNA Association with Melanoma Recurrence and Metastasis from a Machine Learning Point of View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Connections for Matters of the Heart: Network Medicine in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying molecular biomarkers characteristic of ischemic stroke has the potential to aid in distinguishing stroke cases from stroke mimicking symptoms, as well as advancing the understanding of the physiological changes that underlie the body's response to stroke. This study uses machine learning-based analysis of gene co-expression to identify transcription patterns characteristic of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
methodsMutual information values for the expression levels among 13,243 quantified transcripts were computed for blood samples from 82 stroke patients and 68 controls to construct a co-expression network of genes (separately) for stroke and control samples. Page rank centrality scores were computed for every gene; a gene's significance in the network was assessed according to the differences in their network's pagerank centrality between stroke and control expression patterns. A hybrid genetic algorithm - support vector machine learning tool was used to classify samples based on gene centrality in order to identify an optimal set of predictor genes for stroke while minimizing the number of genes in the model.
resultsA predictive model with 89.6% accuracy was identified using 6 network-central and differentially expressed genes (ID3, MBTPS1, NOG, SFXN2, BMX, SLC22A1), characterized by large differences in association network connectivity between stroke and control samples. In contrast, classification models based solely on individual genes identified by significant fold-changes in expression level provided lower predictive accuracies: < 71% for any single gene, and even models with larger (10-25) numbers of gene transcript biomarkers gave lower predictive accuracies (≤ 82%) than the 6 network-based gene signature classification. miRNA:mRNA target prediction computational analysis revealed 8 differentially expressed micro-RNAs (miRNAs) that are significantly associated with at least 2 of the 6 network-central genes.
conclusionsNetwork-based models have the potential to identify a more statistically robust pattern of gene expression typical of acute ischemic stroke and to generate hypotheses about possible interactions among functionally relevant genes, leading to the identification of more informative biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.