ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019
Factors influencing women's decision-making regarding complementary medicine product use in pregnancy and lactation.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional and complementary medicine attitudes and practices of pregnant women for abnormal vaginal discharge.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Fish oil and probiotic food supplements: consumptions and attitudes of pregnant women in four European countries.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Investigating Pregnant Women's Attitudes toward Herbal Remedies: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine use by pregnant women in Japan: a pilot survey.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Attitudes pregnant women in Türkiye towards holistic complementary and alternative medicine and influencing factors: a web-based cross-sectional study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Correlates of higher anxiety scores reported by women admitted for elective caesarean section.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Food Supplement Use Differs from the Recommendations in Pregnant Women: A Multinational Survey.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Demographics, health literacy and health locus of control beliefs of Australian women who take complementary medicine products during pregnancy and breastfeeding: A cross-sectional, online, national survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Sustainability in transformation of maternal mortality by interaction based approach in Dairi, Indonesia.Journal of public health research · 2021Article
- "Fear of stopping" vs "wanting to get off the medication": exploring women's experiences of using domperidone as a galactagogue - a qualitative study.International breastfeeding journal · 2021Article
- Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2021Article
- Digital Tools as Parental Support-A Study Protocol Describing Prospective Development and Exploration of Two Digital Tools for Parents.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- The risk-risk trade-offs: Understanding factors that influence women's decision to use substances to boost breast milk supply.PloS one · 2021Article
- Expecting parents' use of digital sources in preparation for parenthood in a digitalised society - a systematic review.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of complementary medicine product (CMP) use by pregnant or breastfeeding Australian mothers is high, however, there is limited data on factors influencing women's decision-making to use CMPs. This study explored and described the factors influencing women's decisions take a CMP when pregnant or breastfeeding.
methodsQualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were held with 25 pregnant and/or breastfeeding women who currently used CMPs. Participants' health literacy was assessed using a validated single-item health literacy screening question and the Newest Vital Sign. Interview and focus group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
resultsParticipants were a homogenous group. Most had higher education, medium to high incomes and high health literacy skills. They actively sought information from multiple sources and used a reiterative collation and assessment process. Their decision-making to take or not to take CMPs was informed by the need to establish the safety of the CMPs, as well as possible benefits or harms to their baby's or their own health that could result from taking a CMP. Their specific information needs included the desire to access comprehensive, consistent, clear, easy to understand, and evidence-based information. Women preferred to access information from reputable sources, namely, their trusted health care practitioners, and information linked to government or hospital websites and published research. A lack of comprehensive, clear, consistent, or evidence-based information often led to decisions not to take a CMP, as they felt unable to adequately establish its safety or benefits. Conversely, when the participants felt the CMPs information they collected was good quality and from reputable sources, it reassured them of the safety of the CMP in pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. If this confirmed a clear benefit to their baby or themselves, they were more likely to decide to take a CMP.
conclusionsThe participants' demographic profile confirms previous research concerning Australian women who use CMPs during pregnancy and lactation. Participants' high health literacy skills led them to engage in a reiterative, information-seeking and analysis process fuelled by the need to find clear information before making the decision to take, or not to take, a CMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.