Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390996›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Factors influencing women's decision-making regarding complementary medicine product use in pregnancy and lactation.

Larisa Ariadne Justine Barnes, Lesley Barclay, Kirsten McCaffery, Parisa Aslani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Investigating Pregnant Women's Attitudes toward Herbal Remedies: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Larisa Ariadne Justine BarnesThe University of Sydney, School of Pharmacy and University Centre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, PO Box 3074, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia. larisa.barnes@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-775X
Lesley BarclayThe University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health and Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Kirsten McCafferyThe University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Parisa AslaniThe University of Sydney, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Rm N502, Pharmacy & Bank Building (A15), Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

Blackmores Ltd. PhD Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of complementary medicine product (CMP) use by pregnant or breastfeeding Australian mothers is high, however, there is limited data on factors influencing women's decision-making to use CMPs. This study explored and described the factors influencing women's decisions take a CMP when pregnant or breastfeeding.

methodsQualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were held with 25 pregnant and/or breastfeeding women who currently used CMPs. Participants' health literacy was assessed using a validated single-item health literacy screening question and the Newest Vital Sign. Interview and focus group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

resultsParticipants were a homogenous group. Most had higher education, medium to high incomes and high health literacy skills. They actively sought information from multiple sources and used a reiterative collation and assessment process. Their decision-making to take or not to take CMPs was informed by the need to establish the safety of the CMPs, as well as possible benefits or harms to their baby's or their own health that could result from taking a CMP. Their specific information needs included the desire to access comprehensive, consistent, clear, easy to understand, and evidence-based information. Women preferred to access information from reputable sources, namely, their trusted health care practitioners, and information linked to government or hospital websites and published research. A lack of comprehensive, clear, consistent, or evidence-based information often led to decisions not to take a CMP, as they felt unable to adequately establish its safety or benefits. Conversely, when the participants felt the CMPs information they collected was good quality and from reputable sources, it reassured them of the safety of the CMP in pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. If this confirmed a clear benefit to their baby or themselves, they were more likely to decide to take a CMP.

conclusionsThe participants' demographic profile confirms previous research concerning Australian women who use CMPs during pregnancy and lactation. Participants' high health literacy skills led them to engage in a reiterative, information-seeking and analysis process fuelled by the need to find clear information before making the decision to take, or not to take, a CMP.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDietary SupplementsLactationPregnant PeopleAdultAustraliaBreast FeedingComplementary TherapiesEducational StatusFemaleGalactogoguesHealth LiteracyHumansIncomePlant PreparationsPregnancyGalactogoguesPlant PreparationsTrace ElementsVitaminsBreast feedingComplementary therapiesDecision makingDietary supplementsHealth literacyHerbal medicineInformation seeking behaviourPregnancyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31390996
PMCPMC6686446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.