ArticleBMC genomics2019
A seed-extended algorithm for detecting protein complexes based on density and modularity with topological structure and GO annotations.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCIPG2.0: multi-omics fusion and structure-aware graph autoencoding for protein complex identification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- PCGAN: a generative approach for protein complex identification from protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A supervised protein complex prediction method with network representation learning and gene ontology knowledge.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- An Ensemble Learning Framework for Detecting Protein Complexes From PPI Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Systematic analysis of the lysine malonylome in Sanghuangporus sanghuang.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- An Improved Memetic Algorithm for Detecting Protein Complexes in Protein Interaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe detection of protein complexes is of great significance for researching mechanisms underlying complex diseases and developing new drugs. Thus, various computational algorithms have been proposed for protein complex detection. However, most of these methods are based on only topological information and are sensitive to the reliability of interactions. As a result, their performance is affected by false-positive interactions in PPINs. Moreover, these methods consider only density and modularity and ignore protein complexes with various densities and modularities.
resultsTo address these challenges, we propose an algorithm to exploit protein complexes in PPINs by a Seed-Extended algorithm based on Density and Modularity with Topological structure and GO annotations, named SE-DMTG to improve the accuracy of protein complex detection. First, we use common neighbors and GO annotations to construct a weighted PPIN. Second, we define a new seed selection strategy to select seed nodes. Third, we design a new fitness function to detect protein complexes with various densities and modularities. We compare the performance of SE-DMTG with that of thirteen state-of-the-art algorithms on several real datasets.
conclusionThe experimental results show that SE-DMTG not only outperforms some classical algorithms in yeast PPINs in terms of the F-measure and Jaccard but also achieves an ideal performance in terms of functional enrichment. Furthermore, we apply SE-DMTG to PPINs of several other species and demonstrate the outstanding accuracy and matching ratio in detecting protein complexes compared with other algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.