Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390951›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2019

Fear, fight, familiarize: the experiences of people living with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and taking oral medication.

Eva Van Reenen, Wieke Van Der Borg, Merel Visse, Hanneke Van Der Meide, Leo Visser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 'So Let's Go On Like This?'-Shared Decision-Making and the Use of Outcome Information in Routine Care Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Understanding quality of life across different clinical subtypes of multiple sclerosis: a thematic analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Medication Experience: A Concept Analysis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva Van Reenena Chair Care Ethics and Policy, University of Humanistic Studies , Utrecht , The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-653X
Wieke Van Der Borgb Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre , Amsterdam UMC , The Netherlands.
Merel Vissea Chair Care Ethics and Policy, University of Humanistic Studies , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Hanneke Van Der Meidec Tranzo, Tilburg University , Tilburg , The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-3201
Leo Vissera Chair Care Ethics and Policy, University of Humanistic Studies , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
University of Humanistic Studies · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ImmunomodulationAdministration, OralAdultAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFearFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingQualitative ResearchYoung Adultdisease modifying treatmentMultiple sclerosisoral medicationphenomenologyqualitative

Identifiers

PMID31390951
PMCPMC6713094
OpenAlexW2969003599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.