Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390850›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Predicting Visual Acuity Deterioration and Radiation-Induced Toxicities after Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanomas.

Charlotte A Espensen, Ane L Appelt, Lotte S Fog, Anita B Gothelf, Juliette Thariat, Jens F Kiilgaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Central subfield thickness predicts visual acuity outcomes in plaque-irradiated eyes with choroidal melanoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  12. Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Charlotte A EspensenDepartment of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ane L AppeltLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-9218
Lotte S FogDepartment of Physical Sciences, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Anita B GothelfDepartment of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Juliette ThariatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4755-496X
Jens F KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. jens.folke.kiilgaard@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-1460
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKÉcole Nationale Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Caen · FRPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Arvid Nilssons Fond Charlotte EspensenDansk Kræftforsknings Fond Charlotte EspensenSynoptik Foundation Charlotte EspensenThe Danish Eye Research Foundation Charlotte EspensenYorkshire Cancer Research Academic Fellowship L389AA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy is an established modality for eye-preserving treatment of choroidal melanoma. To achieve optimal treatment outcomes, there should be a balance between tumour control and the risk of healthy tissue toxicity. In this retrospective study, we examined normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for visual acuity deterioration and late complications to aid the understanding of dose-dependence after Ru-106 treatments. We considered consecutive patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma and primarily treated at a single institution from 2005-2014. Treatment plans were retrospectively recreated using dedicated software and image guidance to contour the tumour and determine the actual plaque position. Dose distributions were extracted from each plan for all relevant anatomical structures. We considered visual acuity deterioration and late complications (maculopathy, optic neuropathy, ocular hypertension, vascular obliteration, cataract and retinal detachment). Lasso statistics were used to select the most important variables for each analysis. Outcomes were related to dose and clinical characteristics using multivariate Cox regressions analysis. In total, 227 patients were considered and 226 of those were eligible for analysis. Median potential follow-up time was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.5-6.0). Visual acuity deterioration was related to optic disc-tumour distance and dose metrics from the retina and the macula, with retina V10Gy showing the strongest correlation. Macula V10Gy was the only dose metric impacting risk of maculopathy, while optic disc-tumour distance also proved important. Optic disc V50Gy had the largest impact on optic neuropathy along with optic disc-tumour distance. Optic disc V20Gy was the only variable associated with vascular obliteration. Lens D2% had the largest impact on the risk of cataract along with older age and the largest base dimension. We found no variables associated with the risk of ocular hypertension and retinal detachment. Visual acuity deterioration and most late complications demonstrated dependence on dose delivered to healthy structures in the eye after Ru-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas.

Indexed as

brachytherapychoroidal melanomadose-responsenormal tissue complication probability

Identifiers

PMID31390850
PMCPMC6721463
OpenAlexW2965511505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.