Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390778›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Energy Intake Requirements in Pregnancy.

Jasper Most, Sheila Dervis, Francois Haman, Kristi B Adamo, Leanne M Redman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exercise during pregnancy: increased oxygen uptake and metabolic demand.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Investigating the Origins of Biochemical Dysregulation in Trisomy 21 Pregnancy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasper MostPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-5629
Sheila DervisSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Francois HamanSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Kristi B AdamoSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Leanne M RedmanPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA. leanne.redman@pbrc.edu.
University of Ottawa · CAPennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI AUGUSTO C. OCHOA · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Determinants of gestational weight gain in obese pregnant womenR01DK099175 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI REDMAN, LEANNE MAREE · 2013 to 2015
$1.8M
CIHR MOP142298NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK099175NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy intake requirements in pregnancy match the demands of resting metabolism, physical activity, and tissue growth. Energy balance in pregnancy is, therefore, defined as energy intake equal to energy expenditure plus energy storage. A detailed understanding of these components and their changes throughout gestation can inform energy intake recommendations for minimizing the risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. Energy expenditure is the sum of resting and physical activity-related expenditure. Resting metabolic rate increases during pregnancy as a result of increased body mass, pregnancy-associated physiological changes, i.e., cardiac output, and the growing fetus. Physical activity is extremely variable between women and may change over the course of pregnancy. The requirement for energy storage depends on maternal pregravid body size. For optimal pregnancy outcomes, women with low body weight require more fat mass accumulation than women with obesity, who do not require to accumulate fat mass at all. Given the high energy density of fat mass, these differences affect energy intake requirements for a healthy pregnancy greatly. In contrast, the energy stored in fetal and placental tissues is comparable between all women and have small impact on energy requirements. Different prediction equations have been developed to quantify energy intake requirements and we provide a brief review of the strengths and weaknesses and discuss their application for healthy management of weight gain in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansPregnancyenergy expenditureenergy intakefetal developmentmetabolic ratephysical activitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31390778
PMCPMC6723706
OpenAlexW2966328208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.