Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390535›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2019

Decoupling developmental apoptosis and neuroblast proliferation in Drosophila.

Katherine Harding, Kristin White

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine HardingMassachusetts General Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Kristin WhiteMassachusetts General Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02129, USA. Electronic address: kristin.white@MGH.Harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

The regulation of cell death in vivoR01GM110477 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITE, KRISTIN, ZHOU, LEI · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
Nikon A1 laser scanning confocal microscope equipped for live imaging of cells anS10RR027673 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITE, KRISTIN · 2010 to 2010
$500k
Life and death decisions in Drosophila neural stem cellsR03NS092063 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITE, KRISTIN · 2015 to 2016
$174k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027673NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110477NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS092063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell proliferation and cell death are opposing but fundamental aspects of development that must be tightly controlled to ensure proper tissue organization and organismal health. Developmental apoptosis of abdominal neuroblasts in the Drosophila ventral nerve cord is controlled by multiple upstream spatial and temporal signals, which have also been implicated in control of cell proliferation. It has therefore remained unclear whether developmental apoptosis is linked to active cell proliferation. Previous investigations into this topic have focused on the effect of cell cycle arrests on exogenous induction of apoptosis, and thus have not addressed whether potential effects of the cell cycle lie with the sensing of damage signals or the execution of apoptosis itself. In this report, we show that developmental apoptosis is not inhibited by cell cycle arrest, and that endogenous cell death occurs independently of cell cycle phase. We also find that ectopic neuroblasts rescued from cell death retain the competency to respond to quiescence cues at the end of embryogenesis. In addition, we observe multiple quiescence types in neuroblasts, and we show that cell death mutant embryos display a specific loss of presumptive G2 quiescent abdominal neuroblasts at the end of embryogenesis. This study demonstrates that upstream control of neuroblast proliferation and apoptosis represent independent mechanisms of regulating stem cell fate, and that execution of apoptosis occurs in a cell cycle-independent manner. Our findings also indicate that a subset of G2Q-fated abdominal neuroblasts are eliminated from the embryo through a non-apoptotic mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell ProliferationCentral Nervous SystemDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsPhenotypeResting Phase, Cell CycleDrosophila ProteinsApoptosisDrosophilaNeuroblastQuiescenceStem cells

Identifiers

PMID31390535
PMCPMC6814563
OpenAlexW2964976624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.