Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390470›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Medical knowledge infused convolutional neural networks for cohort selection in clinical trials.

Chi-Jen Chen, Neha Warikoo, Yung-Chun Chang, Jin-Hua Chen, Wen-Lian Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary care perspectives on implementation of clinical trial recruitment.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi-Jen ChenGraduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Neha WarikooInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Chun ChangGraduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jin-Hua ChenGraduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Lian HsuPervasive AI Research Labs, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2): Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical NarrativesR13LM013127 · NLM · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2019 to 2023
$100k
Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411NLM NIH HHS R13 LM013127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this era of digitized health records, there has been a marked interest in using de-identified patient records for conducting various health related surveys. To assist in this research effort, we developed a novel clinical data representation model entitled medical knowledge-infused convolutional neural network (MKCNN), which is used for learning the clinical trial criteria eligibility status of patients to participate in cohort studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we propose a clinical text representation infused with medical knowledge (MK). First, we isolate the noise from the relevant data using a medically relevant description extractor; then we utilize log-likelihood ratio based weights from selected sentences to highlight "met" and "not-met" knowledge-infused representations in bichannel setting for each instance. The combined medical knowledge-infused representation (MK) from these modules helps identify significant clinical criteria semantics, which in turn renders effective learning when used with a convolutional neural network architecture.

resultsMKCNN outperforms other Medical Knowledge (MK) relevant learning architectures by approximately 3%; notably SVM and XGBoost implementations developed in this study. MKCNN scored 86.1% on F1metric, a gain of 6% above the average performance assessed from the submissions for n2c2 task. Although pattern/rule-based methods show a higher average performance for the n2c2 clinical data set, MKCNN significantly improves performance of machine learning implementations for clinical datasets.

conclusionMKCNN scored 86.1% on the F1 score metric. In contrast to many of the rule-based systems introduced during the n2c2 challenge workshop, our system presents a model that heavily draws on machine-based learning. In addition, the MK representations add more value to clinical comprehension and interpretation of natural texts.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPatient SelectionClinical Trials as TopicData MiningHumansNatural Language ProcessingSupport Vector Machineclinical trialscohort selectionconvolutional neural networkmedical recordsnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID31390470
PMCPMC7647228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.