Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390108›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2019

Successful expansion of community-based drug-resistant TB care in rural Eswatini - a retrospective cohort study.

Bernhard Kerschberger, Alex Telnov, Nanako Yano, Helen Cox, Inoussa Zabsonre, Serge Mathurin Kabore, Debrah Vambe, Siphiwe Ngwenya, Barbara Rusch, Marie Luce Tombo and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bernhard KerschbergerMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini.
Alex TelnovMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland.
Nanako YanoClinton Health Access Initiative, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Helen CoxInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Inoussa ZabsonreMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini.
Serge Mathurin KaboreMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini.
Debrah VambeNational TB Control Programme, Manzini, Eswatini.
Siphiwe NgwenyaNational TB Control Programme, Manzini, Eswatini.
Barbara RuschMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland.
Marie Luce TomboMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini.
Iza CigleneckiMedecins Sans Frontieres (Operational Centre Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland.
Médecins Sans Frontières · UGMédecins Sans Frontières · CHSouthern Africa Nazarene University · SZWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProvision of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) treatment is scarce in resource-limited settings. We assessed the feasibility of ambulatory DR-TB care for treatment expansion in rural Eswatini.

methodsRetrospective patient-level data were used to evaluate ambulatory DR-TB treatment provision in rural Shiselweni (Eswatini), from 2008 to 2016. DR-TB care was either clinic-based led by nurses or community-based at the patient's home with involvement of community treatment supporters for provision of treatment to patients with difficulties in accessing facilities. We describe programmatic outcomes and used multivariate flexible parametric survival models to assess time to adverse outcomes. Both care models were costed in supplementary analyses.

resultsOf 698 patients initiated on DR-TB treatment, 57% were women and 84% were HIV-positive. Treatment initiations increased from 27 in 2008 to 127 in 2011 and decreased thereafter to 51 in 2016. Proportionally, community-based care increased from 19% in 2009 to 77% in 2016. Treatment success was higher for community-based care (79%) than clinic-based care (68%, P = 0.002). After adjustment for covariate factors among adults (n = 552), the risk of adverse outcomes (death, loss to follow-up, treatment failure) in community-based care was reduced by 41% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Findings were supported by sensitivity analyses. The care provider's per-patient costs for community-based (USD13 345) and clinic-based (USD12 990) care were similar.

conclusionsAmbulatory treatment outcomes were good, and community-based care achieved better treatment outcomes than clinic-based care at comparable costs. Contextualised DR-TB care programmes are feasible and can support treatment expansion in rural settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesEswatiniFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntitubercular Agentsambulatoireambulatorycommunautécommunitydrug resistance TBEswatinituberculose résistante

Identifiers

PMID31390108
PMCPMC6851784
OpenAlexW2965874692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.