Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390076›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of clinical psychology2020

The relationship between insecure attachment and paranoia in psychosis: A systematic literature review.

Rachel Lavin, Sandra Bucci, Filippo Varese, Katherine Berry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05042050 (Attachment-focused iMAgery Therapy for PSychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05042050 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Attachment-focused iMAgery Therapy for PSychosis (A-iMAPS): a Case Series

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2022 to 2022Enrolled12ConditionsPsychosis, Psychosis-Related PTSDArmsA-iMAPS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The revised Psychosis Attachment Measure: further psychometric evidence.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Fluctuations in proximity seeking and paranoia.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel LavinDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Sandra BucciDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Filippo VareseDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Katherine BerryDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-5462
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesParanoia is a key symptom in psychosis and associated with a range of poor outcomes. Earlier life experiences increase vulnerability to paranoid thinking, and attachment theory has been proposed as a key model in explaining this causal pathway. Previous reviews highlight evidence of associations between insecure attachment styles and overall severity of psychotic symptoms. Studies report on associations between insecure attachment and paranoia, but to date, this literature has not been adequately synthesized. The aim of the current review was to report the strength and consistency of associations between paranoia and insecure attachment across published studies, and provide systematic appraisal of study quality.

methodWe carried out a systematic review of electronic databases using search terms to capture concepts of adult attachment, paranoia, and psychosis. We pre-registered the review protocol and followed PRISMA guidelines.

resultsSignificant associations were reported in 11 out of 12 studies between an insecure attachment and paranoia, with associations remaining significant in studies that controlled for comorbid symptoms. The strongest, most commonly reported relationship was between an anxious attachment style and paranoia.

conclusionsThe findings support the proposed role of attachment insecurity in the development and maintenance of paranoia in psychosis and highlight the need to address insecure attachment representations in the treatment of paranoia. PRACTITIONER POINTS: There is consistent evidence of associations between insecure attachment style and paranoia. Insecure anxious attachment is more consistently associated with paranoia than an insecure avoidant attachment. Associations between attachment and paranoia remain significant when key confounders are controlled for in the analyses. Interventions that address insecure attachment representations and promote a more secure attachment are likely to help reduce paranoia.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentFemaleHumansMaleParanoid DisordersPsychotic Disordersadult attachmentparanoiapsychosisreview

Identifiers

PMID31390076
PMCPMC7028113
OpenAlexW2966506472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.