Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31390057›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

Diagnostic value of biopsy sampling in predicting histology in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Lucian R Chirieac, Yin P Hung, Wai Chin Foo, Matthias D Hofer, Paul A VanderLaan, William G Richards, David J Sugarbaker, Raphael Bueno

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mesothelioma: morphologic and immunohistochemical findings.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Contemporary management of mesothelioma.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucian R ChirieacDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-6938
Yin P HungDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8568-1591
Wai Chin FooDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthias D HoferDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paul A VanderLaanDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-5652
William G RichardsDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
David J SugarbakerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Raphael BuenoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic Molecular Tests in MesotheliomaR01CA120528 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BUENO, RAPHAEL · 2006 to 2021
$4.8M
International Mesothelioma ProgramNCI NIH HHS R01 CA120528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe classification of diffuse malignant mesothelioma into epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid types is based on histologic patterns. The diagnosis is made on biopsies, and because of intratumoral heterogeneity, they may not be representative of the entire tumor. The number and volume of biopsies needed to reach diagnostic accuracy in diffuse malignant mesothelioma and their prognostic value remain unclear.

methodsThis study examined 759 consecutive patients with pleural diffuse malignant mesothelioma treated by pleurectomy/decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy for the presence of epithelioid and/or sarcomatoid histology and classified both the presurgery biopsies (core-needle or thoracoscopic) and surgical resection specimens. The number and volume of biopsies were correlated with pre- and postsurgery histologies and overall survival.

resultsDiffuse malignant mesothelioma was classified as epithelioid (76%), biphasic (18%), sarcomatoid (5%), or indeterminate (1%) in biopsies and as epithelioid (64%), biphasic (32%), and sarcomatoid (4%) in surgical resection specimens (overall concordance, 80.6%). The positive likelihood ratios were 2.4, 13.6, and 90.1 for biopsies with epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid histologies, respectively. Concordant histologies between biopsies and resections were associated with a higher number of biopsies (median tissue blocks for concordant histologies vs discordant histologies, 3 vs 2; P < .002) but were less associated with a higher volume (median, 1.2 vs 1.1 cm

conclusionsIn contrast to epithelioid histology, sarcomatoid histology in biopsies is highly accurate. Despite intratumoral heterogeneity, the accuracy of histologic classification increases with the number of tissue blocks examined, emphasizing the diagnostic value of extensive sampling by presurgery biopsies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedYoung Adultextrapleural pneumonectomymalignant mesotheliomapathology

Identifiers

PMID31390057
PMCPMC7341068
OpenAlexW2965943602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.